Research and analyze a public figure’s social media conflict and create a presentation that tells their story and explains social media’s impact on the conflict.

 

Instructions:

For this assessment, tell a visual and written story that explains how social media can impact conflict with public figures. To do this, create a 10–12 slide PowerPoint presentation in which you use text and visuals to support your narrative.

Note that one of the qualities of a good PowerPoint presentation is not having too much text on each slide. Use the slide notes feature to flesh out your points. You might think of this as a script for what you would say if you were presenting verbally.

Research and Selection

1. Select a Public Figure:

· Choose a public figure who has been involved in a social media conflict. This can be a celebrity, politician, athlete, or any other prominent individual.

· Ensure there is enough information available to analyze the conflict in detail.

2. Gather Information:

· Collect at least three credible sources that provide information about the conflict. These can include news articles, social media posts, interviews, and academic articles.

· Summarize the key points from each source, highlighting the main aspects of the conflict and the public figure’s involvement.

Analysis

1. Conflict Description:

1. Provide a detailed description of the conflict. Include information on:

· The background and context of the conflict.

· The main parties involved.

· How the conflict started and escalated.

· The role of social media in escalation and/or de-escalation of the conflict.

2. Communication Behaviors:

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

PowerPoint Presentation: The Social Media Storm – The Case of Roseanne Barr

(10-12 Slides)

Slide 1: Title Slide

  • Title: The Social Media Storm: How Twitter Fueled the Conflict and Cancellation of Roseanne Barr
  • Subtitle: Analyzing a Public Figure’s Social Media Conflict and its Impact
  • Your Name/Course
  • Visual: A split image: one side showing a smiling Roseanne Barr, the other side showing a stylized Twitter logo with storm clouds gathering around it.

PowerPoint Presentation: The Social Media Storm – The Case of Roseanne Barr

(10-12 Slides)

Slide 1: Title Slide

  • Title: The Social Media Storm: How Twitter Fueled the Conflict and Cancellation of Roseanne Barr
  • Subtitle: Analyzing a Public Figure’s Social Media Conflict and its Impact
  • Your Name/Course
  • Visual: A split image: one side showing a smiling Roseanne Barr, the other side showing a stylized Twitter logo with storm clouds gathering around it.

Good morning/afternoon everyone. Today, we’ll be examining the significant impact social media can have on conflict involving public figures. Our case study will focus on the controversy surrounding comedian Roseanne Barr and her infamous tweet in 2018, exploring how Twitter amplified the conflict and ultimately led to the cancellation of her revived sitcom.”

Slide 2: Introducing Roseanne Barr – The Context

  • Title: Roseanne Barr: A Comedic Force and Her Return
  • Bullet Points:
    • Groundbreaking sitcom “Roseanne” (1988-1997) known for its portrayal of a working-class family.
    • Barr herself was a controversial figure, known for outspoken views.
    • Revival of “Roseanne” in 2018 was a major television event, garnering high ratings.
    • The revival often touched on politically charged topics, reflecting Barr’s own conservative leanings.
  • Visual: A photo of the cast of the “Roseanne” revival.

(Slide Notes): “To understand the 2018 conflict, it’s important to remember the context surrounding Roseanne Barr. Her original sitcom was a cultural phenomenon, and her outspoken personality was a key part of her public persona. The revival of ‘Roseanne’ was highly anticipated, and it deliberately engaged with contemporary political and social issues, often mirroring Barr’s own conservative viewpoints. This pre-existing environment of heightened political awareness and Barr’s history of controversial statements set the stage for the events that unfolded.”

Slide 3: The Spark – The Infamous Tweet

  • Title: The Tweet That Ignited the Firestorm
  • Image: A screenshot of Roseanne Barr’s tweet targeting Valerie Jarrett. (Note: Be mindful of the content and consider blurring or partially obscuring if necessary for presentation guidelines, but the visual reference is crucial).
  • Brief Text Below Image: “Muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj”
  • Source Citation (small font): [Link to a news article reporting the tweet]

(Slide Notes): “The conflict erupted with this single tweet posted by Roseanne Barr on May 29, 2018. The tweet targeted Valerie Jarrett, a senior advisor to former President Barack Obama, who is African American. The comparison to the ‘Muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes’ was widely interpreted as racist and Islamophobic.”

Slide 4: Immediate Social Media Reaction – The Outcry

  • Title: Social Media Erupts: Outrage and Calls for Accountability
  • Visual: A collage of screenshots showing various reactions to the tweet on Twitter:
    • Tweets expressing shock and disgust.
    • Tweets using hashtags like #Roseanne, #Racism, #BoycottRoseanne.
    • Tweets from other celebrities and public figures condemning Barr’s statement.
    • Retweets and quote tweets amplifying the message.
  • Bullet Points (summarizing the sentiment):
    • Widespread condemnation of the tweet as racist and offensive.
    • Calls for ABC to take action, including boycotting the show.
    • Public figures distanced themselves from Barr.
    • The speed and volume of the reaction were unprecedented.

(Slide Notes): “The immediate reaction on social media, particularly Twitter, was swift and overwhelmingly negative. The tweet went viral within minutes, sparking a massive outpouring of outrage. Users across the platform expressed their shock and condemnation, using hashtags to organize the discussion and amplify their calls for accountability. Many other celebrities and public figures also weighed in, publicly denouncing Barr’s statement. The sheer speed and volume of this reaction demonstrate the power of social media to instantly disseminate information and mobilize public opinion.”

Slide 5: ABC’s Response – Pressure and Decision

  • Title: Corporate Response Under the Social Media Spotlight
  • Visual: The ABC network logo alongside a news headline announcing the cancellation of “Roseanne.”
  • Bullet Points:
    • ABC initially issued a statement condemning Barr’s remarks.
    • The intense and sustained pressure on social media played a significant role in their decision-making.
    • ABC swiftly announced the cancellation of the “Roseanne” revival within hours of the tweet.
    • Channing Dungey, then president of ABC Entertainment, called the remarks “abhorrent, repugnant, and inconsistent with our values.”

(Slide Notes): “Faced with the immense public outcry fueled by social media, ABC network was under significant pressure to respond decisively. Their initial statement condemning the tweet was quickly followed by the announcement of the show’s cancellation. While internal considerations undoubtedly played a part, the sheer volume and intensity of the social media backlash clearly accelerated and likely influenced ABC’s decision. The network recognized the potential damage to its brand and values if it continued to air a show led by someone who had made such offensive remarks.”

Slide 6: Barr’s Initial Reaction and Subsequent Activity

  • Title: Roseanne’s Social Media Aftermath: Defense and Further Controversy
  • Visual: Screenshots of some of Roseanne Barr’s subsequent tweets:
    • Initially defending her statement or claiming misinterpretation.
    • Later issuing an apology (often interspersed with other commentary).
    • Retweeting supportive messages and engaging with critics.
  • Bullet Points:
    • Barr initially defended her tweet, sometimes blaming Ambien or claiming it was a joke.
    • She later issued apologies, but her social media activity remained erratic and often contradictory.
    • Her continued use of Twitter kept the controversy alive and prevented it from fading quickly.
    • Engaging with both supporters and detractors further amplified the conflict.

(Slide Notes): “Following the cancellation, Roseanne Barr remained active on Twitter, further shaping the narrative and prolonging the conflict. Her initial reactions ranged from defending her words and offering explanations to issuing apologies. However, her continued engagement on the platform, often with inconsistent messaging and further controversial statements, prevented the issue from dissipating. By directly interacting with both those who supported her and those who condemned her, she kept the spotlight firmly fixed on the controversy.”

Slide 7: The Spin-Off – “The Conners”

  • Title: A New Beginning? “The Conners” and the Lingering Impact
  • Visual: A promotional image for the spin-off sitcom “The Conners.”

This question has been answered.

Get Answer