Evaluating dimensions of quality in healthcare and how various industries can apply these concepts to improve operations. Using the resources available to you, research the priorities in the current publication of the National Quality Strategy.
Select and discuss one (1) priority that is the most important to healthcare today.
Discuss how an industry, other than healthcare, can use your aforementioned strategy to improve operations.
Report your findings by using one (1) of the methods below:
3-4 page fact sheet for the general community.
The use of first person is permitted for this Assignment. APA formatting (e.g., title page, conclusion, font size, etc.) should not be used if you choose to complete the memorandum, infographic, PSA, or newscast.
Although the use of APA formatting is not required for this Assignment, proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and an APA formatted reference list of sources are expected.
The venerable political author and longtime left-wing agitator Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. comes out swinging - to position it with courtesy - in his September 23, 2004 new york ebook overview article “The Making of a multitude,” that's ostensibly a evaluate of three books analyzing the Bush administration ‘warfare cabinet’, but in fact is a scathing polemic of the Bush administration’s unilateral stampede to battle with Iraq, and the complicity of the yankee news media in appropriately failing to scrutinize the motives for doing so. Schlesinger has quite an awl to grind, and as opposed to really reviewing the books -- upward push of the Vulcans: The records of Bush's battle cupboard, by means of James Mann, A Pretext for struggle: September 11, Iraq, and the Abuse of the united states's Intelligence businesses by means of James Bamford, and After the Empire: The Breakdown of the american Order through Emmanuel Todd - he as an alternative makes use of them for supply cloth to excoriate the neoconservatives who populate Bush’s overseas policy apparatus. If the reader can get beyond the truth that this is hardly ever an goal piece of journalism, it quickly will become though clear that it's miles a completely well argued critique of the ideas, rationales, and strategies employed to concoct, sell, execute, and spin the struggle with Iraq. The neoconservatives (or Vulcans as Mann terms them) in Bush’s cabinet encompass Assistant Secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz, vp Dick Cheney, countrywide protection consultant (and now Secretary of country) Condoleezza Rice, (now former) Secretary of nation Colin Powell, and Deputy Secretary of country Richard Armitage. Mann makes a distinction that Schlesinger does no longer, that is that the two management officers who absolutely have army enjoy, Powell and Armitage (both served in Vietnam) were adamantly against the rush to conflict (now not a accident, certainly), and need to more aptly be termed pragmatists, no longer neoconservatives. those conflict veterans were politically outmaneuvered and outnumbered inside the Iraq debate, with disastrous effects. what's a neoconservative anyway? they may be a newish breed of political animal in Washington, D.C., more often than not proper-wing Republicans of intellectual, academic backgrounds and narrowcast, idealistic ideologies approximately the usa’s entitlement to dominate global affairs in a unilateralist version. Mann believes that many within the neoconservative motion, whether working presently in the administration of George W. Bush or in the closely connected universe of conservative suppose tanks that shape a revolving door in Washington, D.C., are disciples of the German truth seeker Leo Strauss (1899-1973), who in keeping with Schlesinger “… taught his disciples a perception in absolutes, contempt for relativism, and pleasure in summary propositions. He authorized of Plato's "noble lies," disliked plenty of current life, and believed that a Straussian elite in authorities could in time conquer feelings of persecution.” The neoconservative ideology bears little resemblance to conventional conservatism and its abhorrence for the cussed idealism of activism, appreciate for lifestyle, and its notion inside the fundamental true of limited government. With recognize to Iraq, the neoconservatives hatched a delusion wherein Iraq can be without problems converted into a democracy, which would in turn cause a domino impact of yankee values - or at least the neoconservatives’ version -- being inculcated into the lifestyle of the middle East. that is each smug and foolish, Schlesinger thinks, as among other things, it reflects the neoconservatives’ lack of regard for history and its accompanying classes. despite George W. Bush’s statement of “venture finished” and a unfastened, country wide Iraqi election these days brought to the records books, the adventure in Iraq has been an unmitigated failure from any goal viewpoint, which of path guidelines out the skewed, self-serving propaganda of the Bush management. infinite tens of hundreds of Iraqi civilians have been killed, public utilities and the financial system are in worse form than before Saddam Hussein turned into deposed, a complete-fledged insurgency kills or assassinates dozens of americans and Iraqis an afternoon and has rendered entire sections of the u . s . ungovernable no matter the presence of one hundred fifty,000 American squaddies. that is a far cry from Wolfowitz’ now-notorious pre-warfare declaration that the Iraqis could be throwing flowers at the yank troops. The plant life at the moment are improvised explosive devices (IEDs, in military parlance), and the neoconservative fantasy and its resultant test has value the usa over $two hundred billion, many key alliances, and the respect of the arena at big. How on the earth did these neoconservatives promote this warfare as a noble idea? One best has to appearance as a long way as the philosophy of Strauss - the noble lie - to remember that the reasons given to the american people and to the arena at huge had been outright falsehoods. regardless of the proper reason(s) for going to war, about which Schlesinger notes there are numerous theories but few difficult records, the Bush administration basically decided in early 2002 that an invasion of Iraq changed into a fait accompli and started searching for attainable excuses to do it. in the beginning, Bush and the neoconservatives created an air of extreme urgency, claiming Saddam Hussein changed into in ownership of weapons of mass destruction, and turned into on the verge of the use of them at any time inside the close to future. To their chagrin, no weapons of mass destruction were ever found, and Colin Powell’s humiliation>GET ANSWER