As we are learning this week, race, class and ethnicity play an important role in people’s access to drugs and to treatment, as well as in how people are treated by addiction specialists, public health institutions, law enforcement, and the overall criminal justice system.
Watch this important TedMed talk by neuroscientist, drug researcher, and racial justice activist, Dr Carl Hart: http://www.tedmed.com/speakers/show?id=308946
Then write a 275-word post in ESSAY format that responds to the following questions.
1.Who is Carl Hart and what is unique about his background?
2.What were his original beliefs about drugs and crime and what changed his perspective?
3.According to Hart, what are some facts around race, class, addiction, and the war on drugs?
4.What are his three suggestions at the end for addressing drug use in America?
5.What is your reaction to his ideas? (Agree? Disagree? Why?)
which “encompasses people who see gender as a prime category of evaluation, who critique female drawback, and who paintings to improve girls’s scenario” (rupp & taylor, 1999, p. 364). whether or not or no longer a members be given the label of being a feminist and/or maintain feminist ideals was assessed via the feminist beliefs and conduct scale (zucker, 2004). the degree regarding cardinal beliefs of feminists become created to decide members’ compliance with with the basic feminist precept being, equality among sexes. the scale includes three items about the cardinal ideals of feminists responded in a dichotomous yes/no layout accompanied by means of one query to access the members’ willingness to pick out as a feminist. the 3 items consist of, “ ladies and ladies have now not been treated in addition to boys and men in our society,” “males and females have to be paid similarly for the equal paintings,” and “women’s unpaid work need to be greater socially valued”. x women, rejected all 3 beliefs, x girls recommended one belief, x endorsed two ideals and x endorsed all three beliefs. to finish , individuals solution the query, “do you take into account your self a feminist?” yet again in a yes or no format either accepting the label of a feminist or now not accepting the label of a feminist. girls had been taken into consideration feminists in the event that they advocated all three of the cardinal beliefs and standard the label of a feminist. ladies have been considered egalitarians if they recommended all 3 cardinal beliefs of feminists but spoke back no to accepting the label of a feminist. women were taken into consideration non-feminists if they rejected as a minimum one cardinal belief as well as the label of a feminist. procedure this examine is a survey conducted on the college of latest jersey, wherein a sample of female university college students were recruited through the piper pool to participate. participants had been examined on their attitudes towards menstrual taboo classified ads. the dependent variable is self-objectification. whilst members arrived to the specified pc lab, they signed their call at the signal-in sheet and sat down at a pc to begin the survey. there has been about 15 individuals taking the survey in the lab along with researchers gift at some stage in each session. to start, all members had been requested to signal an knowledgeable consent shape, which recommended them that the examine became getting used to check their health ideals. this form diagnosed all exclusion criterion, capacity risks and blessings, and the functions of the take a look at. the take a look at turned into administered in a tcnj research lab and did no longer take longer than 30 minutes to complete. subsequent, a water bottle advertisement changed into considered via individuals accompanied by randomly assigned tampon classified ads. all classified ads and messages were regarded in the identical language, english. after viewing the commercials, initial reactions of individuals had been assessed through series questions. ultimately, a separate survey that requested questions on people ideals approximately their bodies and their health become finished.participants started answering questions about the moderator being tested. to evaluate the moderators, participants completed questions about self-objectification, menstrual expertise, and feminist identification. additional moderators with the intention to be examined all through the have a look at include self-esteem, body-photo and openness to menstruation.upon of entirety of the survey, individuals have been debriefed regarding the examine. they had been then aware that the purpose is to recognize the non-public factors which can impact ladies to view menstruation negatively which would in the end lead ladies to self-objectify. consequences because of failure of attention checks, 3 members’ responses were excluded from analyses, resulting in a final pattern size of 68. individuals’ mean self-objectification ratings ranged from 2.seventy one – 5.sixty three (m = four.02, sd = .sixty six). there were no substantial differences in self- objectification by using circumstance (f > zero.05). individuals’ imply menstrual knowledge rankings ranged from 0.80 (m = zero.7164, sd = 1.4418). there had been no widespread variations in menstrual knowledge by using condition (f>0.05). contributors’ attitudes towards suggest menstruation rankings ranged from four.13 (m = four.01, sd = .7075). for this variable, cronbach’s alpha changed into more than 0.7 ( α = .752), and for this reason dependable. there were no giant variations in attitudes toward menstruation by circumstance (f>zero.05).. descriptive data among all variables covered inside the examine are proven in table 1. on the bivariate level, it was observed that women who displayed more nation self-objectification had more terrible attitudes closer to menstruation. the frequencies and chances for ratings at the feminist identity measures are presented in table 2. a multivariate linear regression turned into conducted to look at the quantity to which menstrual knowledge, taboo messages, and attitudes toward menstruation are expecting country self-objectification (see desk 3). al>GET ANSWER