A reader’s report provides a clear, indepth description of an academic article and closely analyses the argument made by the original author. It identifies, describes and discusses the meaning and purpose of the article. In your reader’s report, use the following questions as a guide to help structure your report:
1. Identify the argument, the theory or methodology employed by the author, and the purpose of the examples used.
2.Describe the form of the essay, comment on the structure in terms of the argument and analysis. How does the structure develop across the essay to justify the argument?
3. What is the impact of the argument in relation to the wider field of media studies? It is likely it will be necessary to research related articles/books to your chosen essay; however these should assist your analysis of the primary text.
The Reader’s Report will be assessed according to:
*the quality of the writing – particularly the focus, clarity, coherence, precision
*the clarity of the argument – its development throughout the essay
*the ability to define and analyse the theory/theories used and the discussion of the author’s argument in relation to media studies in general.
Other important points to consider:
By nature, the Reader’s Report should be descriptive, concise, and clear; your aim should be to describe the argument and show indepth understanding. (n.b.: Your task is not to recommend it for publication, to say whether it is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ or to argue against the author’s main claims. The point is to analyse the argument on its own terms)
Consider whether this is a major article/essay that is central to media studies, and examine how it fits in relation to the field in detail. How does it work (structurally, rhetorically, argumentatively) to develop such a compelling case? What previous gap has it filled?
Or: is this a minor article/essay that addresses a gap/problem in the field of media studies? Why is it important and how does the argument fit within the field?
An example of how you might want to structure your Reader’s Report:
Part One = 800 words describing the argument, structure, and theory employed in the article (think of this as a kind of mini-close reading of the whole article)
Part Two = 1200 words describing the argument, theory/theories, and overall position developed by the article in relation to the wider field (think of this a slightly more developed discussion that places the article within the context of the broader field of media studies)
By definition Muckrakers was the name given to US columnists and different essayists who uncovered defilement in governmental issues and business in the mid twentieth century. The term was first utilized by Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Normally these columnists "Mud slingers" assaulted set up foundations, organizations, and pioneers. In current it would be called investigative news coverage. It is said that mud slingers and their courageous detailing style had opened the eyes of numerous perusers to the obscure cruel side of mechanical free enterprise. (Perry, 2004) Maligners were to some named saints. (It might be a cliché, however it was very valid for writers when the new century rolled over. The print upheaval empowered distributions to expand their memberships significantly. What showed up in print was currently more great than any time in recent memory. Keeping in touch with Congress with expectations of rectifying manhandle was moderate and frequently created zero outcomes. Distributing a progression of articles had a significantly more prompt effect. All in all called MUCKRAKERS, an overcome framework of correspondents uncovered shameful acts so grave they made the blood of the normal American run chilly.) (obscure, 2008-2016) Defamers affected business and legislative issues in ways nobody could have envisioned. They composed stories and explored to brush the finish off what some would call embarrassments and insider facts. They got out individuals and organizations for misrepresentation and debasement. (The first to strike was Lincoln Steffens. In 1902, he distributed an article in MCCLURE'S magazine called "TWEED DAYS IN ST. LOUIS." Steffens uncovered how city authorities worked allied with huge business to keep up control while adulterating general society treasury. ) (obscure, 2008-2016) After the production from Lincoln Steffens an ever increasing number of writers distributed articles and even a book to take after. Before long open clamor requested change of city government and offered quality to the dynamic thoughts of a city commission or city director framework. (obscure, 2008-2016) There is one Muckraker that emerges from the others because of the blend he made with his distribution "THE JUNGLE". Upton Sinclair, an affirmed communist who would have liked to represent the unpleasant impacts of free enterprise on the specialists in the Chicago meatpacking industry. (obscure, 2008-2016) (The book itemized specialists giving up their fingers and nails by working with corrosive, losing appendages, getting maladies, and drudging extended periods in cool, cramped conditions. He trusted people in general objection would be fierce to the point that changes would before long take after.) (obscure, 2008-2016) (Sinclair additionally revealed the substance of the items being sold to the overall population. Ruined meat was secured with synthetic substances to conceal the scent. Skin, hair, stomach, ears, and nose were ground up and bundled as head cheddar. Rats moved over distribution center meat, deserting heaps of waste. Sinclair said that he went for America's heart and rather hit its stomach. Indeed, even President Roosevelt, who instituted the ridiculing term "mud slinger," was pushed to act. Inside months, Congress passed the PURE FOOD AND DRUG ACT and the MEAT INSPECTION ACT to control these sickening misuse.) (obscure, 2008-2016) As you can envision this influenced organizations, governmental issues, and nationals contrarily. When the mud slingers were through, nobody could question the truth of defilement amongst business and government was a verifiable certainty. Not a solitary individual could question the horrible results of this framework for human lives in a period of unencumbered corporate avarice. (Oppenheimer, 2017) The Muckrakers objective was to reveal such things as pay off, political defilement, extortion, and anything amiss with the administration. Things the general population of these urban communities ought to know about or think about that are kept mystery by our "pioneer" or individuals in a seat of intensity. Mud slingers focused on many turn-of-the-century shameful acts expedited by the huge increment of migrants, the fast development of the urban communities, unregulated huge business and the impact of political machines, and in addition numerous other social issues. (Snap, 2003-2017) The maligners uncovered debasement in business, including unreasonable trusts, protection extortion and perils of patent meds, were uncovered. Mud slingers additionally scrutinized misuse of intensity in legislative issues and government. (Snap, 2003-2017) In many cases, muckraking articles went up against an intense nature. Magazine editors would frequently put forth an admirable attempt to check the actualities as they were accounted for in their distributions. A few defamers even lived in the ghettos they expounded on or worked in the production lines they researched. The verifiable idea of the meddlers' articles leant believability to the message the writers were sending to the American perusers. (Snap, 2003-2017) Defamers are still around today you extremely simply don't here that term excessively. In the dynamic period maligners uncovered so much and did what they could to advise the general population of America. Regardless we see that today on news channels, in papers, even via web-based networking media, for example, Facebook. Only this past race things were uncovered like embarrassments, and phony votes or votes being changed. We see and hear everything around us. That is the reason these individuals climate called mud slingers or simply investigative columnists are some of the time named saints. Individuals of America need to know reality about stuff. We have to know the degenerate horrids of our general public so we can be mindful. If not for them we would all be oblivious in regards to things around us.>GET ANSWER