Real GDP per capita in the United States is $10,000

  If real GDP per capita in the United States is $10,000, what will real GDP per capita in the United States be after five years if real GDP per capita grows at an annual rate of 2.9%? (Show your work and explain your answers.) Chile has a population of 19.5 million and a GDP of $253 billion. Denmark has a population of 6.25 million and a GDP of $327 billion. Which country has a higher standard of living, and why? How did you determine who has the better living standard? (Reference any academic and non-academic articles used to make this determination.) Movement between which points in the following diagram would reflect only a technology change? Movement between which points in the following diagram would reflect only an increase in the available capital per worker? If a country is already fairly wealthy, what should it concentrate more on: increasing capital per worker or encouraging positive technological change? Why? (Explain each answer, do not just list letters

In this case:

  • Present Value = $10,000
  • Interest Rate = 2.9% or 0.029
  • Number of Periods = 5
Future Value = $10,000 * (1 + 0.029)^5 
≈ $11,536.85

So, after 5 years, the real GDP per capita in the United States will be approximately $11,536.85.

Question 2: Comparing Standards of Living: Chile vs. Denmark

Understanding the Problem: We're given the population and GDP of Chile and Denmark. We need to determine which country has a higher standard of living.

Solution: To compare standards of living, we need to calculate GDP per capita for each country. GDP per capita is calculated by dividing the total GDP by the population.

For Chile:

  • GDP per capita = GDP / Population = $253 billion / 19.5 million ≈ $13,000

For Denmark:

  • GDP per capita = GDP / Population = $327 billion / 6.25 million ≈ $52,320

Conclusion: Denmark has a significantly higher standard of living than Chile. This is because its GDP per capita is much higher, indicating that, on average, each Danish citizen has a greater share of the country's economic output.

Question 3: Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) and Economic Growth

Movement Between Points:

  • Technology Change: A movement from point A to point B on the PPF would represent a technological advancement, allowing the economy to produce more of both goods without sacrificing any of the other.
  • Increase in Capital per Worker: A movement from point A to point C on the PPF would represent an increase in capital per worker, allowing the economy to produce more of both goods.

Focus for a Wealthy Country:

A wealthy country should prioritize encouraging positive technological change. While increasing capital per worker can still boost economic growth, the diminishing returns to capital investment in such countries mean that technological advancements are more likely to yield significant productivity gains.

Explanation:

  • Technological Change: Innovation can lead to the development of new products, more efficient production processes, and improved organizational methods, all of which can significantly boost economic growth.
  • Capital per Worker: While additional capital can increase output, its impact may be limited in wealthy countries that already have a high level of capital investment.

In conclusion, while both capital accumulation and technological progress are important drivers of economic growth, a wealthy country should prioritize technological innovation to sustain long-term economic prosperity.

Question 1: Real GDP per Capita Growth

Understanding the Problem: We're given an initial real GDP per capita of $10,000 and an annual growth rate of 2.9%. We need to calculate the final GDP per capita after 5 years.

Solution: We can use the formula for compound interest to calculate the future value of the initial GDP per capita:

Future Value = Present Value * (1 + Interest Rate)^Number of Periods