Response discussion 3 to each with 100-150 words
Susanna
When participating in any type of discussion or meeting it is appropriate and desirable to establish what is and what is not allowed. This is the definition norms : “a principle of right action binding upon the members of a group and serving to guide, control, or regulate proper and acceptable behavior” (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). Norms are sets of rules that guide the behaviors of groups or societies. In our discussion, we are referring to group norms.
Norms vary between groups but professional discussion groups may have some of the following norms taken from Reid’s Dilemmas in Educational Leadership: “Start with the positive, support one another with sensitive comments, use discretion, base feedback on observable facts, give feedback only when asked, be honest, be professional.” (Reid, 2014) This is a very good list of acceptable and appropriate behaviors for a critical friends group of educational professionals who meet to collaborate on becoming better teachers. These are all very straightforward rules to follow, although it may be difficult at times. In addition, these norms are necessary for a facilitator to successfully achieve the goals of the group, stay within the time budget, and remind participants of the behavior that is desired to achieve those outcomes.
Three norms that I would strongly desire to be used in a professional group made up of myself and others would be to start with the positive, base feedback on observable facts, and be honest. I believe it is important to be considerate of others when discussing something important to them but I also see the value of giving and receiving constructive feedback. Starting with the positive is always a good rule so that people can see what they have done well but it also softens the blow of the potential hard feedback. Productive feedback will be based on observable work or facts and not people’s opinions. Lastly, honestly, when used appropriately can lead to trust and beneficial relationships between group members.
Lynette
The three norms I would implement during a professional group meeting are positive comments, being honest, and professionalism as stated in the text. No one wants to attend a group meeting where it starts off giving negative comments about the group in a professional setting. Starting off the group meeting being negative is a morale killer and will cause people to come up with excuses so they won’t have to attend. Starting off the meeting by being positive will boost morale and people will want to listen to what is being discussed in the group meeting. Also, they will receive the feedback that is given because of the positive tone. The second norm is being honest in the professional group. It is very important, to be honest in the professional group. Honesty goes a long way, especially in a professional group with those who are attending. Being honest allows the professional to improve areas of weakness. The third norm would be professional at all times during group meetings. It is important to be professional when conducting meetings. During the first week of school, teacher leaders are required to attend workshops discussing how to conduct meetings with the departmental team. During this meeting, we are required to lead by example and stick to the discussion

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer