Reliability of Rotor Transmission System

by | Feb 28, 2023 | Project Management

 

 

Perform an analysis at system level using FTA and FMECA to assess failure of the IGB. This should consider the reliability at the point of dispatch as well as
in flight.
Discussion of system reliability issues and recommendations for changes to design or maintenance tasks in relation to FTA and FMECA Analysis.
Task 2
Your analysis should now be expanded to include the reliability of the Main gearbox lubrication system. Figure 3 shows a Reliability Block Diagram for Loss of
Oil Pressure. This should be integrated into your analysis for the transmission system. Although the analysis should focus on the IGB and Main Gearboxes,
you should consider the effect of reliability on aircraft safety as a whole. For any critical items, you should suggest possible maintenance actions, either
preventative or corrective, and/or any condition monitoring for dormant faults. You will need to justify your analysis with your own research and good
engineering judgment. However, there is no need to develop any aircraft diagrams.
Also discuss the system reliability issues and recommendations for changes to design or maintenance tasks.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Solution

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a system reliability assessment method which can be used to analyze the failure of the Integrated Guided Bomb (IGB). The analysis involves looking at a series of events and conditions in order to determine how they may have contributed to a particular mishap. This type of analysis allows engineers an improved understanding of which parts, processes, or tasks led up to the failure – allowing them greater insight into potential solutions for preventing similar issues from occurring in future designs.

For instance when considering IGB’s dispatch reliability FTA looks at factors such as environmental elements (temperature/weather), human errors like incorrect readings or mishandling of equipment, mechanical components that may not be functioning correctly etc., – all coming together to form a tree-like diagram containing multiple branches based upon each component or factor involved. By examining this diagram one can identify which points were weak links leading up to an incident; giving engineers insight into where improvements must be made in order for similar events from taking place again.

FMECA (Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis) is another tool that can used help assess reliability issues within systems. Similar FTA it looks at various element & processes related to IGB’s performance both on dispatch as well during flight; however FMECA goes further by including actual effects under consideration– enabling evaluators better understand severity level associated with certain failures as well their likelihood occurrence when analyzing data collected over time. Such information can then be used adjust design parameters accordingly so as increase system robustness while also recommending changes maintenance procedures if necessary.

In conclusion then we can see how both FTA & FMECA are essential tools for assessing system reliability with regards to IGB’s – providing engineers deeper insights into what went wrong along with recommendations regarding any necessary changes needed ensure such issues do not arise again! on vacation, I decided to stay home.” Here the dash emphasizes the sudden and unexpected change of plans which was just mentioned.

Sample Solution

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a system reliability assessment method which can be used to analyze the failure of the Integrated Guided Bomb (IGB). The analysis involves looking at a series of events and conditions in order to determine how they may have contributed to a particular mishap. This type of analysis allows engineers an improved understanding of which parts, processes, or tasks led up to the failure – allowing them greater insight into potential solutions for preventing similar issues from occurring in future designs.

For instance when considering IGB’s dispatch reliability FTA looks at factors such as environmental elements (temperature/weather), human errors like incorrect readings or mishandling of equipment, mechanical components that may not be functioning correctly etc., – all coming together to form a tree-like diagram containing multiple branches based upon each component or factor involved. By examining this diagram one can identify which points were weak links leading up to an incident; giving engineers insight into where improvements must be made in order for similar events from taking place again.

FMECA (Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis) is another tool that can used help assess reliability issues within systems. Similar FTA it looks at various element & processes related to IGB’s performance both on dispatch as well during flight; however FMECA goes further by including actual effects under consideration– enabling evaluators better understand severity level associated with certain failures as well their likelihood occurrence when analyzing data collected over time. Such information can then be used adjust design parameters accordingly so as increase system robustness while also recommending changes maintenance procedures if necessary.

In conclusion then we can see how both FTA & FMECA are essential tools for assessing system reliability with regards to IGB’s – providing engineers deeper insights into what went wrong along with recommendations regarding any necessary changes needed ensure such issues do not arise again! on vacation, I decided to stay home.” Here the dash emphasizes the sudden and unexpected change of plans which was just mentioned.

Genghis Khan was a master of the siege The Field Museum declared. He would send scouts out to find out the time that resources and food would be moved, and to look at the guard positioning. This let him know more about their opponents than they know about them. He would cut off supplies to the city so they can’t get new gear. He would starve them and then when they are weak he would attack and take the city. He was able to surprise the defenders by the distance the Mongols could travel in a short time. The Mongols were able to travel very fast on horseback and were able to strike more fear into their opponents like that. He also had men go into the city two or three days before the siege to get prepared to attack from the inside. This was a great idea because it is a two-pronged strategy. An attack from the outside and an attack from the inside too. He used lighting to make his army look bigger to strike fear into his opponents. He used this to make their opponents afraid and when someone is afraid they can’t think straight and they will make a choice that will cost them the city.

Fear is a great weapon in war and it is still used today Psychological Warfare suggested. Genghis Khan was a master of putting fear into the hearts of his opponents and his own men. This fear made his men work harder because they were afraid of him. He also used fear to unite the Mongol tribes under his rule. Before the siege he wants his opponents to know he is coming because they will hesitate and will not be able to fight with a clear mind. Fighting with a clouded mind is very difficult because you can’t think straight, you will make a mistake, or you will do both. He used lighting to make his enemies be afraid because it made the Mongol army look almost three times as larger than it really is. This let him put fear into his enemy’s minds at night which would result in a lack of sleep and their brain won’t be able to work fast and would not be able to react to something as fast as they would normally. Genghis Khan burned whole towns because he wanted his enemies to know his strength and that would make his opponents fear him. Whoever controls the fear in a battle has more control than your enemy’s do.

 

 

The Mongols were masters of the horse archer tactic, and the warriors and legends site gave many examples of why. Before Genghis Khan, the horse archer tactic was used for hunting because on a horse they were able to keep up with the running animals. The Mongols were once a bunch of nomadic tribes and hunting was a huge part of their lives. They adapted to their living conditions by using horses. The Mongols were able to control the horse with their feet and shoot with their bows in hand. This was an effective tactic in a are because the Mongols were always in motion, so their enemies would have a hard time hitting them and the

This question has been answered.

Get Answer