write an argumentative research paper on Erasing student debt
Choose and argue a position (for or against something) or posit a solution (argue how to solve a problem). Within your argument you will clearly state your own position and refute opposing views.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Research Paper: Erasing Student Debt – A Path to Economic Equity
Title Page
Erasing Student Debt: A Path to Economic Equity
Abstract
This research paper explores the contentious issue of erasing student debt and its implications on economic equity. By analyzing the impact of student debt on individuals and society as a whole, this paper argues in favor of implementing debt forgiveness measures to alleviate financial burdens and promote economic stability.
Introduction
The rising student debt crisis in the United States has reached unprecedented levels, with millions of borrowers struggling to repay loans, hindering their financial well-being and economic mobility. This paper aims to advocate for the erasure of student debt as a means to address systemic inequalities and promote social justice.
Body
Background
– Student debt in the U.S. has surpassed $1.7 trillion, burdening individuals with long-term financial obligations.
– High levels of student debt impede young graduates from achieving milestones such as homeownership and retirement savings.
Reasons to Erase Student Debt
1. Promoting Economic Stimulus: By erasing student debt, individuals would have more disposable income to spend on goods and services, boosting the economy.- Evidence: A study by the Roosevelt Institute estimated that cancelling student debt could lead to a GDP increase of $86 billion to $108 billion per year.
2. Addressing Racial Disparities: Student debt disproportionately affects minority communities, exacerbating wealth gaps.- Evidence: Black students are more likely to borrow money for college and struggle with repayment compared to their white counterparts.
3. Fostering Social Mobility: Erasing student debt would provide a fresh start for borrowers, enabling them to pursue higher education, start businesses, or invest in their futures.- Evidence: Research shows that student debt forgiveness can lead to increased entrepreneurship and innovation.
Refutation of Opposing Views
1. Moral Hazard Argument: Critics argue that forgiving student debt rewards irresponsible borrowing behavior.- Refutation: The current student debt crisis is a result of systemic issues such as rising tuition costs, stagnant wages, and lack of financial literacy rather than individual irresponsibility.
2. Cost Concerns: Skeptics raise concerns about the cost of erasing student debt and its impact on government finances.- Refutation: Implementing progressive taxation or reallocating funds from other programs can offset the cost of debt forgiveness while benefiting the economy in the long run.
Conclusion
In conclusion, erasing student debt is not only a viable solution to address economic disparities but also a crucial step towards achieving social justice and equality. By alleviating the financial burdens of borrowers, society can pave the way for a more inclusive and prosperous future for all individuals.
Analysis
The choice of exploring the topic of erasing student debt stemmed from a deep concern for the financial struggles faced by millions of Americans and the desire to advocate for policies that promote economic equity. Through research, I have learned about the multifaceted impacts of student debt on individuals and society, highlighting the urgency of addressing this pressing issue. Moving forward, questions remain about the feasibility of implementing widespread debt forgiveness programs and the long-term implications on the economy.
Reference Page
(Include all relevant sources used in the research paper)
