1. What are some difficulties and potential complications of HFOV in adults?
2. How does the Edi catheter and NAVA work with normal physiology to provide personalized ventilation?
3. describe how ASV works and address the question “Is ASV a weaning mode?”
4. Describe Inverse ration ventilation and describe how manipulation of i-time affects respiratory physiology.
5. Describe the differences in the use of HFOV in adults as compared to its use in neonates.\
6. What is main component of the liquid ventilation, what are indications and adverse effects of liquid ventilation?
7. Compare and contrast nitric oxide and Epoprostenol “Flolan” .
8. What is the goal of AVAPS in patients with chronic conditions?
9. What are some differences between NIV and HFNC?
10. Discuss why patients with an injury to the C1-C3 level of the spinal cord will be ventilator dependent and potential candidates for diaphragmatic pacing. In addition, list three potential complications of diaphragmatic pacing.
11. Explain the difference between depolarizing and non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.
12. What are the advantages of using APRV on a patient suffering from ARDS?
13. Compare and contrast HFOV and APRV.
14. Why do the most recent TBI guidelines recommend normocapnic ventilation? Explain the concept behind the negative physiological response to both hyper and hypocapnia.
15. What are two things that make high frequency ventilation different from any other kind of mechanical ventilation?
The relational moral positions incorporate the idea of man approach, the nature of correspondence approach, correspondence as a social contract, correspondence as a relationship, correspondence as discourse, and the ethic of care. Each of these has a premise in how to treat others, how to deal with particular circumstances, and how they communicate with alternate positions. I will talk about their application in a few cases, and in addition how my of relational ethos ties in with my expert morals. As a matter of first importance, Aristotle's perspective of human instinct "underscores the limit with regards to reason as an extraordinarily human quality." This kind of morals originates from a levelheaded and cognizant individual and what they do openly. This view contends that whatever asserts that nature is moral and whatever subverts it is untrustworthy. The issue with this view is that feeling is to some degree avoided from moral thought, and in this way does not legitimately reflect human instinct. The human instinct approach is to a great degree valuable in making sense of what enticing strategies are moral and what aren't. The human instinct view impacts how I treat others since it shields me from review circumstances with my feelings at the bleeding edge, it encourages me see circumstances where I see individuals reasonably and acknowledge they do to be sure intentionally decide. I trust this application is situational, on the grounds that it isn't generally appropriate to see others as reasonable creatures, now and then individuals commit errors because of enthusiastic influence, psychological maladjustment, and so forth. Another hypothesis, the nature of correspondence approach centers around the possibility that encouraging the sharing of importance is moral and whatever subverts shared significance would be exploitative. This kind of correspondence advances the hypothesis that untrustworthy correspondence hampers shared significance and common comprehension. This attempts to redress circumstances, for example, "lying, amass think, intimidation and influence," yet in addition has a tendency to be excessively oversimplified. The idea of correspondence see impacts how I treat others since it advises me that correspondence with others is about common comprehension between communicators. It reminds me to be honest and direct in my correspondence with others. I trust this application is general since it is constantly imperative to have imparted correspondence to others, and that deceptive correspondence prompts skewed importance and comprehension. The social contract approach takes after the introduce that people meet up on the grounds that they are spurred by their own self-intrigue and consent to principles of direct to frame a social contract. This approach expresses that correspondence circumstances are suggested social contracts with commonly assumed models. This incorporates relationship morals, administrative morals, and the morals of cooperation. Social contractarianism is an extremely helpful structure for building up an expert ethos, particularly for advertising specialists. The social contract see impacts how I treat others since it advises me that individuals will here and there take after their own particular self-interests previously the interests of others, so it is best to locate a center ground to impart on. I trust this application is situational in light of the fact that not all correspondence depends on individuals who are totally self-intrigued. The hypothesis of correspondence as a relationship sets a standard that correspondence is the most essential component in a relationship. It expresses that moral correspondence is the most vital component in looking after connections. The idea of the relationship itself decides the "moral parameters of the correspondence." In this view, moral correspondence is one of legit and open trade of data. This is critical to proficient parts and satisfaction of the duties of expert connections and is helpful in correspondence callings. The correspondence as a relationship see impacts how I treat others since it advises me about the idea of connections as a colossal piece of correspondence overall while staying moral. It enables me to straightforwardly speak with others as I esteem fit. I trust this application is widespread on the grounds that correspondence fabricates connections - both individual and expert - and reminds every one of us to pick transparency in our correspondence. Correspondence as discourse sets correspondence as the genuine worry for the welfare and satisfaction of others. It likewise underlines decision making because of the requests of particular circumstances. It expects affectability to "part obligations of such connections as educator student, specialist quiet," and so on. This features particular correspondence obligations which might be vague in different circumstances since it requires everybody to be similarly empowered to completely take part. The correspondence as exchange see impacts how I treat others since it puts forward worry for the welfare of other rather than simply the possibility of self-satisfaction, while likewise setting points of reference for different kinds of correspondence associations with full engagement. I trust this application is by and by situational, on the grounds that individuals are now and again more worried about themselves than others, however it provides situational lucidity. The morals of minding comes from women's activist morals yet isolates itself from women's liberation in a couple of ways. By and large, the morals of care rejects persecution, questions objectivity over feeling, of separation over engagement, of people in general circle over the private circle, and of people over connections. The ethic of care conflicts with the impartial methodologies and has significance to a wide range of correspondence morals, particularly relational morals. The morals of minding view impacts how I treat others since it really exceeds expectations in denying mistreatment, and spreads correspondence as a reciprocal procedure instead of a one-sided process, and is particularly significant for relational connections. I trust this application is widespread on the grounds that we ought to dependably endeavor to make minding correspondence both by and by and professionally. As I am including in excess of one position, I will talk about how the human instinct view, social contract view, and discourse see collaborate. The human instinct view reminds us to maintain the significance of human motivation to morals, and the social contract and exchange view can be converged to advise us that there is constantly self-enthusiasm and in addition worry for others blended into correspondence morals.>GET ANSWER