Begin by choosing 1 of the 7 messages written to the angels of the seven churches addressed in Revelation Chapters 2 and 3. Then, in a 1000–1500-word essay, in current Turabian format, complete the following: 1. Write an interpretive exposition on the passage that comprises the chosen message (i.e., the message to the angel of the church at either Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, or Laodicea). 2. Detail the specific application of the message as received by the 1st century church to whom the message was addressed. 3. Explain legitimate applications of the message to the church today.
management’s duty and selling openness and transparency of business and to offer self belief to buyers. companies commonly comply to governance codes as a way to maintain their legitimacy. And companies need to conform with the spirit of the code, no longer the letter. inside the area of gentle or tough regulation, it must be emphasized that nobody argues that each one corporate governance policies must be mandatory. because the enjoy of the debatable Sarbanes-Oxley rules inside the u.s.a. has illustrated, there aren't any guarantees that one of these step may be conducive ultimately both to a more appealing funding surroundings, or to extra accountable or accountable corporate management. this is partially: (i) due to the fact there's no single version of powerful company governance or apparent quality practices; (ii) due to the fact the United Kingdom and US systems are always evolving in response to marketplace traits; and (iii) due to the fact corporate governance displays the history and tradition of company management in any given usa. As mentioned above that in corporate governance one rule does not match all. So, the handiest type of company governance that's imposed consensually like the united kingdom and partly German approach. In contrast, the UK version accords a high precedence to shareholders’ pursuits, with less consideration to any other stakeholder. the UK’s present system of corporate governance, self-regulation, totally voluntary and the tracking and manipulate of corporate affairs is insufficient and unsatisfactory to protect the interests of shareholders, lenders and different stakeholder of the agency. assessment with the Germany. It comes front the every other trouble that's the idea at the back of it. standards based totally voluntary code isn't enough to gain neither broader or slim company governance outcomes. a number of them want to be mandatory, which right to gain broader outcomes of company governance and a number of them want to be voluntary to set up according to businesses’ feature. The chance with “comply or explain” is that to the quantity that directors do now not comply and they do not explain, or they provide an explanation for, but they do no longer do so definitely, appropriately or in detail, they fail to be accountable. The Germans have this announcing: “Vertrauen ist intestine, Kontrolle ist besser!” (“trust is ideal however manipulate is higher”), it is higher to govern a few provision, it should no longer be definitely voluntary. in the end, systems by myself will by no means remedy all of the problems of corporate governance. despite the fact that, up to date systems offer the first-rate coverage we can acquire in opposition to every other Polly p.c., Holzmann or Enron.>GET ANSWER