Risk management and quality management departments
Organizations have tried several different approaches for creating an organizational structure that supports collaboration between the risk management and quality management departments. Which structure do you think would be most effective? Should the departments be combined? Should each department have a manager that reports to the same director? Is there a better alternative? Be sure to explain your answer.
Another approach organizations can take when attempting to foster collaboration between risk management and quality management teams is by instituting a “matrix” type of organization wherein each team has its own manager that reports directly to their respective director but also works closely with members from other teams in order to complete cross-functional tasks or projects. This type of structure allows for more flexibility since project assignments can be moved around if needed without too much disruption within the hierarchy as well as allowing individuals from different departments/teams work together efficiently . Although this system does require additional coordination amongst managers (as well as added complexity) comparedtoasingleorganizationalstructureifdonecorrectlyitcancreateawin-win situation where employees benefit from increased variety task exposure while company enjoys added agility responsiveness when embarking large scale initiatives involving multiple functions .
It should be noted that whatever approach organization decides take , clear objectives must bedefined upfront so everyone alignedunderstandingcommongoalsandtasksinvolvedmakingcoalescenceofbothdepartmentsallthemoresmootherintheprocess . Having unified vision will help ensure continuous improvement practices are implemented throughout enterprise whilst keeping long term value proposition tangible & reachable insteadofjustbeingabstractconceptshelpingemployeesremainmotivatedduringeachstageoftransformationaljourney .