Write an argumentative essay ont the role of happiness in Aristotelian ethics and Utilitarianism

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Solution

Happiness has been a central theme in both Aristotelian ethics and Utilitarianism. In Aristotelian ethics, happiness is seen as the ultimate goal in life – the highest “good”. This idea is based on the concept of eudaimonia, which is often translated as “human flourishing” or “the good life”. According to Aristotle, one should aim for a particular kind of virtuous character (or ‘excellence of character’) that will bring about greater levels of happiness in oneself and others. The key virtues are courage, temperance, justice, wisdom and friendship.

Sample Solution

Happiness has been a central theme in both Aristotelian ethics and Utilitarianism. In Aristotelian ethics, happiness is seen as the ultimate goal in life – the highest “good”. This idea is based on the concept of eudaimonia, which is often translated as “human flourishing” or “the good life”. According to Aristotle, one should aim for a particular kind of virtuous character (or ‘excellence of character’) that will bring about greater levels of happiness in oneself and others. The key virtues are courage, temperance, justice, wisdom and friendship.

In contrast, Utilitarianism takes a more practical approach to defining happiness – it does not rely on any abstract ideal like eudaimonia but instead suggests that pleasure is what constitutes true human flourishing. According to utilitarianism, one should maximize pleasure while minimizing pain by making decisions with an eye towards producing the greatest amount of benefit overall (i.e., maximizing utility). As such, individuals should act so as to bring about the most beneficial outcome for society as a whole rather than just themselves or their own immediate circle of family and friends.

Despite these differences in approach between Aristotelian ethics and Utilitarianism when it comes to defining what constitutes happiness or human flourishing; they agree that it plays an important role in moral decision-making. For Aristotle, this means pursuing virtue and excellence of character – something he believed would lead naturally to true contentment or genuine joy – whereas for utilitarians this means acting always with an eye towards producing maximum benefit for all impacted parties without compromising individual rights or interests unnecessarily.

Overall then there appears much common ground between Aristotelian ethics and Utilitarianism when it comes to how they view the role of happiness in moral decision-making. Both require us to think critically about our actions prioritizes certain goals above others – such as seeking out virtue over short-term gain – if we are truly aiming at achieving lasting contentment or genuine joy over time

This question has been answered.

Get Answer