Sam Harris and Natural Law theory

Post an opinion piece (min 500 words) on whether Sam Harris and Natural Law theory sufficiency establish an
objective ethics? Is he correct to think that there are objective ways of looking at how people should behave
and that we may, for example, condemn as objectively wrong, forced marriages, for example?
For those students who argued against ethical subjectivism/skepticism in the last module, your
response/discussion post may be a refinement of your argument.

Sample Solution