Scaling related to test development

by | Apr 27, 2025 | Analysis

Define scaling related to test development. Examine the types of scales used and the factors to consider when choosing the types of scales to be used.

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Scaling in Test Development

In the context of test development, scaling refers to the process of assigning numerical values or categories to the attributes, characteristics, or constructs being measured by a test or assessment. It involves creating a systematic way to quantify qualitative information, allowing for meaningful interpretation and comparison of test scores. Scaling transforms raw responses or observations into a standardized metric that reflects the level or degree of the construct being assessed.  

Essentially, scaling provides the rules by which we translate observations into data that can be analyzed and interpreted. It dictates the meaning and properties of the scores obtained from a test.  

Types of Scales Used in Test Development

There are four primary types of scales used in test development, each with distinct properties and implications for data analysis and interpretation:  

  1. Nominal Scale: This is the most basic level of measurement. It assigns labels or categories to different attributes without implying any quantitative order or magnitude. The numbers used are simply for identification or classification.  

    • Examples: Gender (1=Male, 2=Female), Ethnicity (1=Caucasian, 2=African American, 3=Asian, etc.), Diagnostic categories (1=Depression, 2=Anxiety, 3=ADHD).  
    • Properties:
      • Categories are mutually exclusive (an observation can only belong to one category).  
      • Categories are exhaustive (all possible observations must be classified into a category).  
      • No inherent order or ranking exists between the categories.  
    • Statistical Operations: Limited to frequency counts, percentages, and mode.

  2. Ordinal Scale: This scale categorizes attributes and also ranks them along a specific dimension. The numbers assigned indicate a relative order, but the intervals between the ranks are not necessarily equal or known.  

Scaling in Test Development

In the context of test development, scaling refers to the process of assigning numerical values or categories to the attributes, characteristics, or constructs being measured by a test or assessment. It involves creating a systematic way to quantify qualitative information, allowing for meaningful interpretation and comparison of test scores. Scaling transforms raw responses or observations into a standardized metric that reflects the level or degree of the construct being assessed.  

Essentially, scaling provides the rules by which we translate observations into data that can be analyzed and interpreted. It dictates the meaning and properties of the scores obtained from a test.  

Types of Scales Used in Test Development

There are four primary types of scales used in test development, each with distinct properties and implications for data analysis and interpretation:  

  1. Nominal Scale: This is the most basic level of measurement. It assigns labels or categories to different attributes without implying any quantitative order or magnitude. The numbers used are simply for identification or classification.  

    • Examples: Gender (1=Male, 2=Female), Ethnicity (1=Caucasian, 2=African American, 3=Asian, etc.), Diagnostic categories (1=Depression, 2=Anxiety, 3=ADHD).  
    • Properties:
      • Categories are mutually exclusive (an observation can only belong to one category).  
      • Categories are exhaustive (all possible observations must be classified into a category).  
      • No inherent order or ranking exists between the categories.  
    • Statistical Operations: Limited to frequency counts, percentages, and mode.

  2. Ordinal Scale: This scale categorizes attributes and also ranks them along a specific dimension. The numbers assigned indicate a relative order, but the intervals between the ranks are not necessarily equal or known.  

    • Examples: Ranking of preferences (1=Most Preferred, 2=Second Most Preferred, etc.), Levels of agreement (1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly Agree), Socioeconomic status (Low, Medium, High).  
    • Properties:
      • Categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive.  
      • Categories have a logical or meaningful order.
      • The magnitude of the difference between ranks is not consistent or quantifiable. We know that “Agree” is more agreement than “Neutral,” but not how much more.
    • Statistical Operations: Median, percentiles, rank-order correlations (e.g., Spearman’s rho).  

  2. Interval Scale: This scale possesses the properties of both nominal and ordinal scales, with the added feature that the intervals between the scale points are equal and meaningful. However, it lacks a true zero point, meaning zero does not represent the complete absence of the attribute being measured.

    • Examples: Temperature measured in Celsius or Fahrenheit (a difference of 10 degrees is the same anywhere on the scale, but 0°C doesn’t mean no temperature), Standardized test scores (e.g., IQ scores, where a difference of 15 points represents a similar difference in the underlying construct across the scale, but a score of 0 doesn’t mean zero intelligence).
    • Properties:
      • Categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive.  
      • Categories have a logical order.
      • Equal intervals between scale points.
      • No true zero point. Ratios are not meaningful (e.g., 20°C is not twice as hot as 10°C in terms of molecular energy).
    • Statistical Operations: Addition, subtraction, mean, standard deviation, Pearson correlation.

  3. Ratio Scale: This is the highest level of measurement. It possesses all the properties of nominal, ordinal, and interval scales, and crucially, it has a true zero point. Zero on a ratio scale indicates the complete absence of the attribute being measured. This allows for meaningful ratios to be calculated.

    • Examples: Height, weight, time, income, number of correct answers on a test. A weight of 100 kg is twice as heavy as a weight of 50 kg because 0 kg represents the absence of weight. A score of 20 correct answers is twice as good as a score of 10 correct answers (assuming all questions are of equal difficulty and measuring the same construct).
    • Properties:
      • Categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive.  
      • Categories have a logical order.
      • Equal intervals between scale points.
      • True zero point exists.
      • Ratios are meaningful.
    • Statistical Operations: All statistical operations are permissible, including multiplication and division.

Factors to Consider When Choosing the Types of Scales

The choice of scaling method is a critical decision in test development and depends on several factors:

  1. Nature of the Construct Being Measured: The fundamental nature of the attribute being assessed dictates the level of measurement that is theoretically possible and meaningful. Some constructs inherently lend themselves to higher levels of scaling (e.g., physical abilities can often be measured on a ratio scale), while others are more abstract and may only allow for ordinal or interval scaling (e.g., attitudes, personality traits).

  2. Purpose of the Test: The intended use of the test scores influences the required level of scaling. If the goal is simply to categorize individuals (e.g., pass/fail), a nominal or ordinal scale might suffice. However, if the aim is to make precise comparisons of the degree to which individuals possess the attribute (e.g., for selection or placement), an interval or ratio scale is generally preferred.

  3. Desired Level of Precision and Detail: Higher levels of scaling provide more detailed and precise information about the differences between individuals. If fine distinctions are important for the test’s purpose, interval or ratio scales should be used.  

  4. Statistical Analyses Planned: The type of scale used directly limits the statistical analyses that can be meaningfully applied to the data. If advanced statistical techniques requiring equal intervals and a true zero are intended, then interval or ratio scaling is necessary.

  5. Practical Constraints and Feasibility: Sometimes, the ideal level of scaling may not be practically achievable due to limitations in data collection methods or the nature of the respondents. For example, it might be difficult to create a true ratio scale for measuring complex psychological constructs. In such cases, the highest feasible level of scaling that still provides meaningful information should be chosen.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer