When should political leaders not follow public opinion, and why? Provide a detailed explanation of your answer using examples.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Solution

Political leaders should not always follow public opinion as it can lead to a variety of unintended consequences. Political leaders must use their expertise, knowledge, and understanding of the issues at hand to make decisions that are in the best interest of the public and the country. For example, if a leader decides to go against popular opinion on an issue based on his or her own personal convictions or beliefs, this could have serious implications for both the people they represent and their own political future.

 

Sample Solution

Political leaders should not always follow public opinion as it can lead to a variety of unintended consequences. Political leaders must use their expertise, knowledge, and understanding of the issues at hand to make decisions that are in the best interest of the public and the country. For example, if a leader decides to go against popular opinion on an issue based on his or her own personal convictions or beliefs, this could have serious implications for both the people they represent and their own political future.

 

For instance, when President Lyndon Johnson decided to sign into law civil rights legislation even though there was strong opposition from many members of Congress at the time, he risked losing support from his party base but ultimately knew it was in the best interest of all Americans regardless of race or gender. Similarly, when President Obama withdrew US troops from Iraq despite public opinion polling showing majority disapproval for such action by voters across America he made decision solely based off what thought would benefit United States longterm rather than simply trying appease those who disagreed with him shortsightedly.

In addition to facing potential backlash for going against public opinion on certain issues, there is also risk being labeled as “unpopular” among constituents which can hurt chances reelection campaign especially if opponent running same election seems more favorable amongst population due taking position aligns more closely with general consensus state things currently stand. This why it important elected officials take note feedback given them carefully weighing pros cons each scenario discussing thoroughly amongst staff before making any final decisions; because while occasional instance may arise where going against grain deemed appropriate case basis circumstances most times better serve citizens sticking original plan course even if means living little bit danger politically speaking end day knowing did right thing thank enough reward itself so don’t let fear failure stop pushing forward order reach ultimate goal success!

This question has been answered.

Get Answer