CASE STUDIES – CHOOSE 1 OF THESE COMPANIES
You are provided research sources (with their APA 7th ed. citations) to get you started. Include these sources in your work.
Siemens – Greek Olympics bribery scandal
Berghoff, H. (2018). Business History, 60(3), 423-445. . [NOTE – SECOND LINK – FULL ARTICLE IN TREFRY LIBRARY]
Marshall. (2013, October 30). Siemens’ staff bribing and corruption scandal. [Video file.] YouTube.
Dearton, T. H. (2015, Jun 27). A firm’s approach to corruption depends on the individual running it: Harvard professor Paul Healy [Corporate Dossier]. The Economic Times
The following covers the assignment content, building on your Week 5 worksheet, with 11 content slides. You may have additional content slides if you need them, but remember that the slides are key points supplemented by the speaker, not a paper distributed over slides. In addition are the Title, Agenda, and References slides.
Slide 1
Title slide
Slide 2
Agenda slide This is an outline of the PPT topics
Slide 3
Introduce and describe the company (name, type of business, its corporate structure)
Key bullet points and image on slide full details in Speakers Notes portion for slide
Tell the story of the facts of the case study leading up to the companys decision, and then what happened.
Slide 5
State precisely and explain the dilemma, the companys decision point, and choice made. Focus on the specific decision choice of your case study. Likely the company was involved in numerous actions.
Slide 6
Identify and explain the law(s) violated by the companys action. Include the laws requirements and purpose. Suggestion: include an example of a violation of the same law by another company.
Slide 7
Describe and explain the legal results for your case study company as a result of violation. For example, if individuals were criminally prosecuted, include that, and also what happened to the company itself. For example, did it end up in bankruptcy? Was it sold? If it survived, what did it do in the wake of the problem?
Slide 8
Summarize the harm caused by the companys decision.
Harm to third parties who were victims of the decision?
Harm to company & stakeholders.
Slide 9
Identify, define, and explain the ethical framework (you selected this in Assignment 5 — egoism, free market ethics, or utilitarianism) that is illustrated by the companys decision and conduct. Include an example of how this ethical framework affects making a decision (an example other than this case study).
Slide 10
Explain how the decision and behavior of the company in this case study illustrates the ethical framework you defined and explained in the previous slide. Compare company to the example you gave in the previous slide.
Slide 11
Identify, define, and explain the alternative ethical framework (you selected this in Assignment 5 – deontology, ethics of care, or virtue ethics) that could have led to a different result for the company. Explain specifically how the company effectively could have employed this alternative framework. Include an example of how it works in making a decision (not the case study example).
Slide 12
The legal issues resulting from the companys decision in this case study were not the only legal problems it had or could have had. Identify another, different legal issue relating to this company. Examples from your studies in the course are: contract disputes; tort claims; violation of a civil or criminal statute or regulation (which you must identify specifically); civil rights; employment issue; whistleblowing. It must be a different legal issue from the laws and regulations involved in the case study violations. You should have identified this in Assignment 5. Develop here.
Slide 13
Recommend: What is a take-away from this case study for exercise of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in management of business operations? Recommend and explain at least one CSR business practice for any business. In determining your recommendation consider the concepts we have studied this term. The company you have studied for this Assignment engaged in practices that ultimately touched or affected all aspects of its management. Your recommendation must be a specific practice for any business to apply. It is not sufficient to say something like “do it differently,” or “be ethical” or “corporately responsible.”
Slide 14
References slide:
Your references must be cited fully in APA7 format, except on your PPT slide it is not necessary to use a hanging indent or double space the citations. More than 7 credible sources are required for exemplary level of the grading rubric with a minimum of 4 being scholarly or peer-reviewed sources. At least 7 credible sources are required for the Accomplished level of the rubric with 3 being scholarly or peer-reviewed. Please see the rubric’s requirements for including scholarly and peer-reviewed sources.