Learners are expected to have weekly interaction with the Faculty Mentor as well as with other Learners through class participation in course Discussion assignments. Learners must post to each Discussion assignment at least twice each week as follows:

In what ways has your motivation and competence been influenced by your locus of control (locus of causality)? Share an example of how both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation has influenced an outcome.

Posting 1 (300 words)

The first post is a direct response to the topic for the week, written in the Learner’s own words to represent a broad integration of relevant knowledge and understanding of assignment topic. The post must include at least two scholarly sources in response that are not part of the required or recommended reading for the course.

Posting 2 (300 words)

The second post must address the topic collaboratively by commenting on the posting of another Learner(s) and/or mentor.

All posts must be written in graduate level English, and include all in-text citations and references, according to 7th edition APA formatting

Activity Outcomes

Explain the significance of locus of control on motivation

When reading about causality orientations in Reeve (2018), I discovered that I certainly have an autonomy causality orientation. I follow my intuition, my needs, and my interests to make decisions, while using my environment as a source of opportunity and information. I seek interest and pay attention to my needs and feelings over what others think (Liu et al., 2020; Reeve, 2018). It is interesting to reflect on the control causality orientation, as my children’s father definitely has this orientation. He either does not or cannot pay much attention to his inner guide, and is concerned more with “should’s,” status, and material and financial success (Reeve, 2018).

I appreciated how another article I found for this post adds to my understanding of causality orientation. Causality orientation is a theory that describes perceptions of control over outcome and how that leads people to act in different ways (Dwyer & Weiner, 2018). Dwyer & Weiner (2018) actually discuss three orientations, controlled, autonomy, and impersonal, but for the purposes of this post, I will only discuss controlled and autonomy. Dwyer & Weiner (2018) describe autonomy causality orientation as people who believe they have control of or over their environment and control causality orientation as people who believe they are externally rewarded when they act in a certain way.

When reflecting on how my motivation and competence have been influenced by my locus of causality, I see how all of my decisions are made in this autonomy causality orientation, and in speaking about my children’s father, how these different locus’ of causality, got in the way of our relationship and co-decision making. I usually do not share about decisions I make in life because they are often counter to mainstream. I am more concerned about following my intuition and what aligns with my morals and ethics, than doing what I am supposed to socially. This has resulted in me being judged by family and society frequently: from homeschooling my children, to drinking raw milk, to getting divorced and getting my PsyD, my intuition and interest is what leads the way.

I am getting my PsyD because I love learning, reading, and researching, and did not want to stop after my Master’s. Honestly, it felt right applying, and school continues to feel right now. This would be following my intuition as part of the autonomy causality orientation. Learning more about psychology, and in ways I would not study and read on my own (when I read, I tend towards narrative and Buddhist/yoga readings, so school opens my eyes and neural pathways in ways it would otherwise not be opened) is interesting and I am using the environment (school, colleagues, and libraries as three examples) as sources of opportunity and information.

Intrinsic motivation involves an inner desire to grow, learn, challenge oneself, and explore (Reeve, 2018). This has been addressed above, hopefully adequately, as to why I am taking courses towards my PsyD. Extrinsic motivation is an environmentally caused (outer) reason to act (Reeve, 2018). If one is extrinsically motivated, one is behaving or acting to achieve an attractive outcome or consequence (Reeve, 2018). Getting good grades and eventually my doctorate are extrinsically motivating factors supporting me getting my PsyD. Thus, both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation will influence my hoped for outcome in receiving my PsyD.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer