(obesity ) What are acceptable feeding practices for babies? How important is body image in different cultures? How do we teach children to make healthy choices? Is it acceptable to restrict children’s food intake and how?
1.Provide an introduction stating the importance of the sociocultural issue and why you were interested in the topic.
2.Describe the issue. Reference theories and examples to explain its importance as it relates to children and their development.
3.Discuss the issue from:
a. the perspective of UAE culture -What practices are usual in the UAE.
b. compare the UAE practices to that of at least 2 other cultures; what are the similarities or differences based on comparisons to the other cultures. important (make it as a table in the paper)
4.As a result of your research, what are some possible recommendations that you may give for use with family, community, and school/classroom (make reference to relevant reading) also, most important is to focus on UAE.
5.The paper should be typed, double-spaced, 12 pt. font, and should be no more/no less than 4 pages in length (not including title page and references).
6.Cite the sources of theories, terms, concepts, ideas where appropriate in the text and in the reference list at the end of the paper, using APA referencing style.
address an issue of interest to you as reflected in class readings and discussions and reflective of children’s current experiences in the UAE. You will make comparisons between the UAE and at least 2 other cultural contexts. You may select one of the sociocultural issues listed below or address a different issue in order to meet the paper requirement. Should you choose a different issue than those listed, please follow-up with your instructor for permission.
Sleeping arrangements What is best for babies, sleeping alone, or with others? What is an acceptable age for children to be expected to sleep in their own bed? How are young children trained to sleep on their own?
Teasing and bullying How is teasing and bullying defined and tolerated in different cultures? What are the consequences of bullying on young children? How is this issue viewed by parents and handled by educators?
Obesity What are acceptable feeding practices for babies? How important is body image in different cultures? How do we teach children to make healthy choices? Is it acceptable to restrict children’s food intake and how?
Gender roles How do young children become socialized to accept particular gender roles? What is acceptable behavior for young boys versus girls in different cultures?
Physical punishment Is spanking a child harmful? Under what circumstances is it acceptable? What is the difference between spanking and physical abuse? What legal consequences are there for parents?
Child labor At what age is it acceptable for children to work? Under what circumstances should children be able to work, especially when this means they will not get an education?
Relationships between children and their fathers What is the role of a father in child rearing? What effects do a good, poor, or no relationship with one’s father have on child development?
Childcare At what age should children begin going to school, or a childcare facility? What are common childcare options for new mothers? What effects do placing young children in childcare or employing nannies have on their development?
Siblinghood How do families prepare children for siblinghood? What rituals exist for welcoming a baby to the home? How does siblinghood affect child development?
1. Provide an introduction stating the importance of the sociocultural issue and why you were interested in the topic.
2. Describe the issue. Reference theories and examples to explain its importance as it relates to children and their development.
3. Discuss the issue from:
a. the perspective of UAE culture -What practices are usual in the UAE.
b. compare the UAE practices to that of at least 2 other cultures; what are the similarities or differences based on comparisons to the other cultures.
"I have no extraordinary speed of trepidation or wit...my energy to take after a long and absolutely dynamic of thought is extremely restricted... (be that as it may, I am better than the regular keep running of men in seeing things which effortlessly escape consideration, and in watching them deliberately" Charles Darwin, Preface to "The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals" Member perception (PO) is one of the more productive methodological ways to deal with examining swarm conduct in the typical society. Clearly, PO incorporates two primary parts, there are taking part and watching. Frame the primary minute individuals was conceived, it as of now been utilized. Individuals utilize perception to watch their general surroundings and attempt to member in it, as such, individuals experience childhood in organization with partaking and watching. There are two fundamental angles in this task also. The principal angle is to clarify the unique situation and recognizable proof of Participant Observation; in second viewpoint, I will center around the morals and reactivity of the four structures which is sketched out in Norris' work. In this part, I will join the fourfold categorisation which created by Gill and Johnson (2002) with the four parts said in Norris' work, and after that finish up my own thoughts regarding the morals and reactivity in PO look into. What is Participant Observation? Member Observation is a subjective strategy with the roots in customary ethnographic research. PO is "the scientist endeavors to take an interest completely in the lives and exercises of subjects and along these lines turn into an individual from their gathering, association or group. This empowers specialists to share their encounters by not just watching what is occurring but rather likewise feeing it " (Gill and Johnson 2002:144). Shape this recognizable proof, it isn't hard to discover that PO isn't just an example information gathering as survey; it is additionally an 'insider'. At the point when specialists doing their errand, as Delbridge and Kirkpatrick (1994:37) takes note of that PO signifies 'submersion in the exploration setting, with the goal of partaking in people groups' lives while endeavoring to take in their representative world'. The mean procedure of Participant Observation is to comprehend and feel individuals' unobtrusive conduct in ordinary lives and 'endeavor to take in their representative world'. So simply seeming well and good about some essential part of human conduct or watching those practices isn't the key purpose of PO, PO process incorporate something other than watch, it additionally has information accumulation and note-taking et cetera. To be completely forthright, as per Bryman (1989): "numerous meanings of ethnography and member perception are hard to recognize frame each other". Talking in principle, Ethnography is an all encompassing exploration. MaCall and Simmons characterize ethnography as:"...some measure of certified social association in the field with the subjects of study, some immediate perception of pertinent occasion, some formal and a lot of casual talking, some methodical tallying, some gathering of reports and curios; and open-endedness toward the path the examination takes." So that is the reason I said that PO is a subjective technique with the roots in conventional ethnographic research in the first place. At the end of the day, PO is incorporated into ethnography inquire about. "Ethnography actually signifies 'a representation a people'. An ethnography is a composed depictions of specific culture - the traditions, convictions, and conduct - in view of data assembled through hands on work" (Marvin Harris and Orna Johnson, 2000). So the ethnography is a multidisciplinary inquire about including 'serious dialect and culture learning, concentrated investigation of a solitary field or space, and a mix of chronicled, observational, and talk with strategies.' The four types of PO illustrated in Norris' work Norris' work considered to some moral contemplations on Field-Work with regards to his own exploration on police culture. Clandestine research versus Plain research Cover look into happens in the circumstance that open don't know about the general population as a scientist and the analyst procedure, the specialists disguise themselves to the general population. In actuality, plain research occur in the circumstance that analysts uncover the genuine personality of themselves to people in general and let the experimenters know the procedure and motivation behind research even let them know the potential danger of research. In any case, the refinement amongst plain and undercover research isn't obvious. There is a case gave by Glucksman (1994), who in the 1970s remaining her scholarly post to chip away at a processing plant mechanical production system to investigate the reasons why women's liberation showed up not to be important to average workers ladies. It could be said, she was a secret spectator, however her thought processes in the examination were basically political and she says that, at the time she was attempted the exploration, she had no aim of composing the book that hence showed up and that was distributed under a nom de plume (1982). After the book's production, it was dealt with for instance of ethnographic research. Each examination technique has the legitimacy and negative mark, so the cover and obvious research are not exemption. The benefits and bad marks of the two structures finish up three principle focuses: reactivity, morals and access. For clandestine research, one of the legitimacy viewpoints is the reactivity isn't an issue, utilizing the secretive research could diminish the reactivity of examinations, since they don't know about being explored. The less reactivity investigate got, the greater legitimacy center information accumulated. The other legitimacy part of clandestine research is anything but difficult to get to. As a result of the stealth of PO rehearse, individuals don't have the foggiest idea about "the individual leading the investigation is a specialist. Along these lines, they are more averse to modify their conduct as a result of the scientist's essence." (Alan Bryman and Emma Bell, 2003:320). The negative mark of secret research is the moral issues. The procedure of research is covert; some looks into center around some security of individuals' conduct, so investigate assembled information without the examination conceded amid the exploration. The experimenters don't get the privilege of "educated assent" too, the moral issues, for example, infringement of the guideline of security happened definitely. For the unmistakable research, morals is a conspicuous legitimacy contrasted and undercover research. Utilizing clear research could give the examination adequate ideal to understanding the reason and procedure of the investigation and the potential hazard they perhaps looked with. Be that as it may, the negative mark of clear research additionally extremely self-evident. The entrance can be exhausting and opportune even may not be allowed; the high level of reactivity to the exploration does not regard the legitimacy of information accumulation. Attributes of Four Forms of PO As per Norris' work, Van Mannen separated the PO procedure into four sections, there are 'SPY', 'VOYEUR', 'FAN', 'Part'. The separation of those four structures rely upon two measurements, there are dynamic and latent. As a matter of fact, those four parts in Norris' work created by Van Mannen on PO explore is the something as Gill and Johnson's fourfold classification of PO, there are finished member, finish eyewitness, onlooker as member and member as spectator. 'SPY' is recognized by Van Mannen as 'dynamic and secret' sort. It is an indistinguishable significance from finish member in Gill and Johnson's fourfold arrangement. The total member part "considers you to be the analyst endeavoring to end up an individual from the gathering in which you are performing research" (Saunders, M. et al., 2008). The examination hid their actual personality and reason for research to open. Amid the exploration procedure, specialist will member in the gathering and pick up trust from he or her associates and make companion with experimenters. Doing like that could lessen the analysts' entrance without an excessive number of issues of assemble center information and take notes all the more effectively. As Norris stated: " when spectator pardoned himself to the can, quickly to jot down notes, he felt like the 'Spy'." 'VOYEUR' is a 'clandestine and latent' sort which is said in Norris' work, it is a total spectator part also. Norris said in his work: "When eyewitness intentionally put in a situation to catch private discussions between officers, onlooker would feel like a 'Voyeur'." The entire spectator is the part that analyst have any correspondence with individuals. For instance, one eyewitness needs to inquire about the extent of green sack utilizing when individuals shooing in the general store. What he or she would do is only a certain something: pulling up a chair close to the exit of the general store or registration counter, assemble the quantity of individuals who was conveying a green sack close by when they got done with shopping , and after that composed a recorddown on the note pad. In this watching procedure, no member taken by the scientists and no reactivity reflected by the clients. 'FAN' is an 'unmistakable and inactive' sort characterized by Van Mannen, Gill and Johnson called this compose as eyewitness as member part. In this part, the specialists appears like a questioner. As Norris stated: "When eyewitness was going to episodes in the city, inactively tuning in and watching, he was the 'Fan'. " this part has not so much member but rather more perception. The analysts uncover themselves to open; individuals are not stayed under cover. 'Part' is distinguished by Van Mannen as 'dynamic and unmistakable' sort. It was called member as eyewitness in Gill and Johnson's discoveries. The member as eyewitness is comparable as entire member, simply the total member is the cover part, and 'Part' is the obvious part. In this part the individual uncovers his or her motivation as an analyst. So in this procedure, the specialists should try more endeavors on picking up trust shape their partners and participate in the gathering effectively. In Norris' work, "when I was left guarding a detainee, presented as a kindred cop, or aided in the capture of a vicious and irritated medication client, I was, to all aims and reason, cast in the part of a cop." This part might be prompts another favorable position which deduced in Robson's investigation: "this is key informa>GET ANSWER