Mike is divorced and has three children. The ex-couple lives two hours away from each other. His ex-wife is not working and has not remarried. He has not re-married either. They sold the house and are now renters and he has custody of the two boys in junior high school and she has custody of the pre-school girl. Mike has found a job with great benefits including comprehensive medical coverage and paid sick days. He works in the transportation department in a major hospital. His job includes transportation within the dietary division and transportation of patients. The hospital is consolidating. He is micro-managed every minute of the day. He is waiting daily for a possible downsizing/restructuring pink slip. His job is an hour and a half away from where he lives and in the opposite direction of his ex-wife’s apartment and he takes public transportation to work every day. He tells his boys to be happy in life and do not do things out of obligation. Analyze this case by taking this week’s reading(s) into account.
Use the reading and the Lecture Lessons/Notes as guides to respond to this scenario. What do we learn about the intersection of work and family life from this case? Is juggling work and family the same for all professions and for all workers? In addition, if one martial partner was a professional athlete and the other a successful artist and the family structure and dynamics were somewhat similar to the scenario above, would this impact on workplace performance for a professional athlete (the mother) and for a successful artist (the father)?
Below is a list of occupational titles commonly known to us. Please rank the occupations listed below by status from 1-9 (9 being the highest). It is possible to have one occupation have the same score as another occupation. After you have ranked the occupations, write down the criteria you used in order to generate your ranking. What is your rubric for rank ordering? How does chapter 11 talk about occupations and professions versus other types of work and or jobs/tasks? Which of the following occupations did your parents not want you to go into and why? How does society think about these types of work? Who is best suited for these jobs and why? Are any of these transitional jobs? How important is each of these to society and why?
(architects, chemical engineer, dentist, judge, physician, lap dancer, model, industrial engineer, musician, college professor, artist, high school English teacher, self-employer proprietor — in retail stores, elementary school teacher, photographer, foreman of machinery, life guard, postmaster, salaried manager in banking, clergyman/person, mail carrier, cashier, college president, secretary, stone mason, blacksmith, elevator operator, hair dresser, construction worker, janitor, coal laborers and mine operatives, fruit picker, prostitute, gift wrapper, sample perfume sprayer at Macy’s at the mall, shoe shine, bathroom attendant, slaughter house worker taking out the toe nails on cattle, chicken gutter, Broadway chorus dancer, and window washer)
How does society view these jobs, tasks, occupations, and or professions? Share this assignment and your answers with someone like a spouse, partner, friend, parent, sibling, co-worker, etc. and interview them and write up how they responded to your ranking and explain if they agreed with it.
Length of Pelvetia Canaliculata on Upper Shore Zone Disclaimer: This work has been put together by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert scholastic essayists. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any feelings, discoveries, ends or proposals communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Distributed: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 Dynamic: The point of this investigation was to think about the length of Pelvetia canaliculata on the upper shore zone of both wave-protected and wave-uncovered shores. The theory was that the Pelvetia fronds developing on the upper shore zone of a wave-protected rough shore will be altogether longer contrasted and fronds developing on the upper shore zone of a wave-uncovered rough shore. The lengths of 450 fronds altogether were tested utilizing precise constant even belt transect examining technique at a wave-uncovered and wave-shielded shores on the Pembrokeshire drift. The outcomes demonstrated that there was a huge contrast in the lengths of the ocean growth with longer fronds being found in the wave-shielded rough shore. This is going on in light of the fact that there is less wave introduction thus fronds are less inclined to be severed at the tips and consequently they will be longer. Presentation Rough shores are zones of bedrock uncovered between the extraordinary high and outrageous low tide levels on the seashore. The biological community is unpredictable, as it is a communication among earthbound and oceanic frameworks. Plants and creatures are dispersed on the shore in level zones that identify with the resilience of the species to either presentation to air or submergence in water amid the tidal cycle. This zonation can be clear and unexpected. Utilizing this reality, I have unmistakably distinguished the zone Pelvetia canaliculata is discovered; the upper shore.  ÂI have looked into this zone in more profundity to have the capacity to comprehend the conditions, the issues and the diverse factors that can influence Pelvetia canaliculata and the adjustments it created to survive and flourish. As the tide level drops on the upper shore, the ocean growth will be presented to air and drying up (drying out) happens therefore. Since the tide ascends and down two times per day life forms at the highest point of the shore get significantly less water than ones at the base. Over a year, the highest point of the upper zone gets secured by the ocean for under 1% of the year while The base of it for around 20% of the year. This is brief time to acquire supplements from the water for photosynthesis, and can along these lines moderate development rate. Notwithstanding, this isn't the main issue as the water channels off a portion of the wavelengths of light and diminish its power thus bringing down photosynthesis rate. Furthermore, the water is the principle medium where dispersal of spores occurs; investing less energy in the water implies low profitability.  Species on the Upper shore get subjected to a wide variety in temperature. Submersion in water cushions against temperature change because of the high particular warmth limit of water. Upper shore species should endure the best variety in temperature while it has minimum impact in the lower shore. High temperatures will expand the danger of drying up and builds saltiness in pools.  The other major physical factor that controls what can live on a shore is wave activity. Uncovered shores have a ton of wave activity and protected shores have close to nothing. Ocean growth locate the drier, more splendid, wave uncovered condition exceptionally hard to adapt to. Shielded shores  Uncovered shores  "Generally confront far from the vast ocean and the overarching wind. This implies they for the most part have littler waves than uncovered shores which look out beyond all detectable inhibitions ocean and the common breeze. Protected shores are as a rule on north to north easterly confronting shores. North-bound shielded shores get less daylight than uncovered ones, and are less helpless to drying up and by and large are more friendly places for between tidal creatures." "Normally look away from any confining influence ocean and the overarching wind. This implies they by and large have greater waves than shielded shores. Uncovered shores are more often than not on south to south westerly confronting shores. South to south westerly confronting uncovered shores get more daylight than shielded ones, are more vulnerable to drying up and by and large are not friendly places for most between tidal creatures." Since I clarified the highlights of the upper shore zone and the uncovered and protected shores I will depict the highlights and the distinctive adjustments that empowered Pelvetia canaliculata to live in such a natural surroundings and continually evolving condition. Taxon English comparable or interpretation  Phylum Chromophycota/Brown ocean growth e.g. kelps and wracks Class Phaeophyceae/Brown ocean growth e.g. kelps and wracks Request Fucales/Fucoids e.g. wracks Family Fucaceae Sort Pelvetia Species canaliculata Pelvetia canaliculata is dull olive green in shading, getting to be dark and fragile as the fronds dry out. P.canaliculata lives for around 4 years and grows up to 150 mm long . The fronds are twisted longitudinally shaping channels that are dichotomously extended closure in swollen and granular regenerative bodies. They don't have air bladders or mid-ribs. Pelvetia canaliculata Pelvetia canaliculata becomes appended to hard substrata utilizing their holdfast; this has the mechanical highlights of a root framework that would be helpful for the ocean growth, holding them unfaltering regardless of how fierce the water development. It endures ultra shielded to respectably uncovered conditions. The green growth P.canaliculata is constrained from living higher on the shore by drying up, yet is kept from colonizing lower levels by rivalry from different types of green growth. Ocean growth likewise need to adapt to touching weight from versatile gastropods.  Over the time of neap tides, the plants may lose up to 65 for each penny of their contained water and end up dry and darkened. Be that as it may, when the spring tides reach out over them, water is consumed and the typical olive-green shading and gentler surface are recovered. It has been assessed that the upper shore plants are uncovered for 90% of the year.  In water, ocean growth get the carbon they requirement for photosynthesis from disintegrated co2 or bicarbonate (HCO3-). At the point when presented to air, photosynthesis can just happen with take-up of CO2 from air. For whatever length of time that the ocean growth don't dry out, numerous species photosynthesize in air at rates like those deliberate when they are completely submerged. Be that as it may, as they start to dry out, their capacity to photosynthesize decreases. Pelvetia canaliculata is discovered high on the shores and is inclined to drying out for extensive stretches of time. The species can photosynthesise when presented to air yet may endure supplement worry as it can just acquire supplements when submerged. Analysts found that inside not as much as multi day of being back in seawater, as example that had been dried up for 6 days could continue full rates of photosynthesis. Truth be told P.Canaliculata requires times of presentation to the air. On the off chance that it is submerged for over 6 hours out of 12 it really begins to rot. This is an uncommon case of an ocean growth animal categories in which periods out of water are significant.  An expansion in wave introduction and water stream rate may cause Pelvetia canaliculata to be removed the substratum or the substratum with plants connected might be assembled. It is impossible that any Pelvetia canaliculata will live in territories of high wave presentation. In quicker moving water the danger of the fronds tearing will expand in light of the expanded drag. Thus Pelvetia canaliculata adjusts its shape to diminish drag contingent upon their area. Pelvetia fronds developing on wave-uncovered shores are shorter and more slender in light of the fact that the fronds are much of the time severed at the tip. Pelvetia canaliculata has numerous adjustments that enable it to survive better in the upper shore contrasted with green growth living down. They have; moved fronds to decrease water misfortune in dissipation, diverts to trap water in the frond, a greasy (slick) layer over the phone that stops water vanishing to moderate drying up, a thick cell divider which shrivels with drying, the capacity to survive low supplement level, a fast recuperation of digestion when the tide returns amid breath and photosynthesis. "It is consequently, an extremely push tolerant alga, very much adjusted to the specialty at the highest point of the shore. "  In view of the data I examined in the presentation I will research and think about the adjustments of Pelvetia canaliculata on two unique destinations where the conditions are extraordinary. I will look at the lengths of the fronds of Pelvetia canaliculata on a wave-shielded rough shore and a wave-uncovered rough shore. Exploratory HYPOTHESIS: There will be a factually critical distinction between the length of the Pelvetia canaliculata developing on the upper shore zone of both a wave-uncovered and a wave-protected rough shore; and that its fronds will be all things considered longer in the wave-shielded shore contrasted and the wave-uncovered rough shore as there is less wave introduction thus fronds are less inclined to be severed at the tips and subsequently they will be longer. Invalid HYPOTHESIS: There will be no measurably huge distinction between the length of the Pelvetia canaliculata developing on the upper shore zone of both a wave-shielded and wave-uncovered rough shores .Any distinction nonetheless, will be because of chance components. Factors: The table beneath records and quickly clarifies the factors that could influence the unwavering quality of the examination and how they will be controlled. Introduction (autonomous) An uncovered shore implies bigger bring henceforth more noteworthy wave activity which prompts the harm of the Pelvetia canaliculata fronds I will complete the examination in regions grouped by the Ballantine's naturally characterized introduction scale to be wave-shelt>GET ANSWER