Sociology is interested in better understanding the social contexts of our social lives. Much of what we
experience in life is impacted by the culture in which we live. The ways of life found around the world differ, not
only in forms of dress, preferred foods, and musical tastes, but also in family patterns and beliefs about right
and wrong. These differences can be attributed to culture—our collective beliefs, values, and objects. While we
oftentimes see names as a reflection of who we are as individuals, they are the product of larger social forces.
Using your sociological imagination, you can reflect on your name and how it is impacted by culture.
Note: Many resources will be coming from The Society Pages blog. While it is good to question the validity of
most blogs, The Society Pages contains blog posts from experts in the field of sociology and thus have higher
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course
competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 4: Analyze the influence of culture on both the individual and society.
Describe how your name is shaped by the social world around you.
Examine the role of culture in naming.
Competency 5: Analyze the impact of social change on society and social institutions.
Discuss the influence of social change regarding how we understand names.
Competency 6: Compose text that articulates meaning relevant to its purpose and audience.
Develop text using organization, structure, and transitions that demonstrate understanding of cohesion
between main and subtopics.
This assessment requires you to do some research on your name. How popular was your name when you
were born? What does your name mean? Based on what you learned from your research, discuss your own
name. How is something as simple as a name shaped by the social world around us? How has your name
been impacted by time period, culture, your gender, et cetera? How might your name be different if you had
been born one hundred years earlier? Why?
Write an essay in which you complete all of the following:
Part 1 – Discuss your name.
What is your name?
Describe where your name comes from.
Discuss the origins of your name (if it is known).
Research the popularity of your name. Discuss other information you find regarding your name.
Part 2 – Examine your name from a sociological perspective.
Describe how your name has been impacted by time period, culture, gender, et cetera.
Identify other aspects of the social world that may be related to naming.
Part 3 – Reflect on your name.
Based on your research and sociological analysis of you name, share your thoughts or perspective on your
name or names in general.
Written communication: Develop text using organization, structure, and transitions that demonstrate
understanding of cohesion between main and subtopics. Written communication needs to be free of errors that
detract from the overall message.
Sources: Cite at least two scholarly sources.
Length: 2-3 pages, not including title and reference pages.
Format: Include a title page and reference page. Use in-text citations to cite your sources. [Example: Writing
becomes better as the child matures (Britton, Thomas, & Miller, 1996).]
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments. In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances. Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence. This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us. To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious "pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything". Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn't restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence. It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another 's psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn't happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange. Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>GET ANSWER