respond to each of these questions in 3-4 sentences: 1. How did women participate in the development of modern Latin American nations? Describe how Dora Maria Téllez was an instrumental figure in the Nicaraguan Sandinista revolution of the 1970s and 1980s. 2. How has corruption shaped internal relations and outside perceptions of Latin America? Describe some of the methods that are working to mitigate the effects of widespread corruption across Latin America today. 3. How did the legacy of European colonialism shape the shift toward Latin American independence during the early-nineteenth century? Describe the circumstances of colonialism in eighteenth-century Latin America, outline the legacy of colonialism, and demonstrate how independence was both reaction against and resistance to changing the existing colonial order. Use at one specific national case to expand your answer. 4. There were two episodes of revolutionary change in modern Latin American history: the first as Latin American nations emerged from Spanish colonialism from the 1780s into the 1840s, and the second at the beginning of the twentieth century when Zapatista fighters set the stage for widespread Communist revolution. By 1830, Latin America had fragmented into 15 separate countries. How can we describe the transition to modernity in Latin America within the context of national revolutions?
44% and are more likely to get into work, compared to 23% of British born (Dunford and Kirk, 2016), from the argument its shows Brexit is slowing the economy down. Although, is the quantity of migrants from Europe enough to halt the growth in our economy? The UK closing its borders to EU nationals would not affect the immigrants coming from other countries, for example India and China, therefore it would not affect the GDP by far. To support this, BBC news reports the increase in growth in our economy: ‘Latest figures show that the economy grew by 0.5% in the three months after the Brexit vote’ (BBC,2016) proving the effect was positive but less than expected at 0.7%. At this point in time figures may not show the full impact of Brexit on the economy as it is recent, however the ratio of people outside of the EU are still greater than the ones within the EU coming to the UK, making the point valid for argument. As the economy grows it attracts new bodies. This is because a growing economy offers great and better opportunities such as better jobs, more pay and better standards of living. How does this benefit the economy? The answer is clear, the monopoly effect. The graph shows the relationship between the number of migrants by citizenship compared to the on-going years. Furthermore, as it gets to 2015 it shows that non-EU and EU citizens have migrated to the UK at the same quantity causing Brexit to be less harmful to a variety of benefits migrants provide to the UK economy. Despite this this evidence may be uncertain as they are survey results and cannot be reliant, data shown may not actually show the real affect. Brexit will cause a reduction in immigration from other European countries, this will lead to a loss of benefits that Britain gain from these migrants. One prime example: Nurses in the UK would decrease if people leave EU, this would result in the increase in spending for recruitment. Causing a deficit to the balance of trade and adding more to the debt the country already obtains. “Nursing leaders warned the government that if lower-earning non-EU workers were to be deported, the shortage of nurses in the UK could worsen and the NHS would have to spend millions on recruitment” (Grace, 2015). Despite this fact, Brexit may also find its positive impacts to the UK’s economy. The economy would become less crowded, meaning the GDP per capita would increase. Even though evidence shows that GDP of Britain would rise by 0.4% the overall population would increase too thus decreasing the GDP per capita. This means by Brexit applying its rules to limit migration it would aim to increase the output of everyone individually rather than a nation by doing this the economy would benefit from more efficiency as less people would require to produce more hence bettering their incomes and benefiting their standards of life. “A previous study by the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, carried out for the European Union, found that the long-run impact of obdurate migration from Eastern Europe between 2004 and 2009 could actually depress UK GDP per capita by -0.17%” this means that if UK’s population continues to grow it would cause a decrease in the percentage for GDP per capita and the output per person would decrease one reas>GET ANSWER