Write as a discussion post.
One of the major issues in leadership is dealing with gender/sex differences. There are hundreds of articles from respectable sources that discusses the difference between women and men in management/leadership. Many of the articles are combating the negative stereotypes of women in leadership roles and their ability to be successful.
The questions I will ask you are “hot button” questions that could raise some particular feelings one direction or the other. I ask that you answer these questions thoughtfully, respectfully, and with an open mind. This is a learning space and I hope that open dialogue is important in the learning process. One person’s view may come from their personal experiences or initial beliefs, but could be swayed to a different viewpoint with quality, well sourced responses.
- We know women can lead and have been successful business and world leaders for years, but are men better in “certain” leadership situations than women?
- Should there be a conscious effort to increase the number of women in leadership roles in organizations?
Different investigations in 1970s uncovered that human mistakes in air ship mishaps could be characterized in three general classifications dependent on conduct approach (Diehl, 1991). These included procedural, perceptual engine, and decisional task. Procedural undertaking which could prompt pilot mistake incorporate botch of vehicle subsystem and arrangement issues and other related blunders like withdrawing the arrival gear as opposed to folds or simply ignoring the gave agenda things. Perceptual engine errands include undertakings like control of flight controls and throttles which would prompt blunders like shooting a float incline sign and numerous others. Dominant part of pilot blunders were anyway credited to choice undertaking which can run from flight wanting to risk assessment (Aviation Knowledge, 2010). These would result to mistakes like inability to legitimately designate errands amid crises. Investigation of deadly mishaps which could be ascribed to steer mistakes uncovered that perceptual engine and decisional methods were significant givers of pilot blunders. CRM preparing was embraced during the 1980s as a measure to address the previously mentioned zones that outcomes to steer blunders. CRM goes for bridling individual aptitudes in every one of these zones to decrease team blunders (Diehl, 1991). So as to decrease flying mishaps, CRM programs have been gone for tending to two principle territories including aeronautical basic leadership (ADM) and situational mindfulness. Aeronautical basic leadership incorporate judgment preparing programs which are psychological based. It is gone for improving frames of mind and conduct of the group individuals. These aptitudes have been connected to prepare other group individuals separated from pilots. Preparing on ADM depends on the way that basic leadership originates from an input system where the pilot needs to deal with his or her consideration and settle on brief choice to spare trip if there should be an occurrence of risk. Then again, situational mindfulness is gone for upgrading consideration and errand the board for the pilots. This is gone for helping the group to deal with the current circumstance utilizing the most proper system. In both common and military flight, records demonstrates that CRM has diminished the quantity of deadly mishaps and flying machine setbacks which can be credited to human mistakes. In U.S Navy, the rate of aircrew setback was diminished from 7.89 in 1986 to only 1.43 in 1990 after CRM was embraced, speaking to a 81% improvement. In USAF, a multi year time span examination when CRM was received in 1985 demonstrates that the quantity of air ships pulverized because of team mistake diminished from 2>GET ANSWER