Final Case Brief Framework/Outline
How will you identify this case? What key nouns and actions words will grab attention?
What is the source of information about this case? Publication title, author, and date; personal observation or communication.
Case Overview“Big picture” interpretation of the case in one or two sentences. How would you characterize the moral challenge of this case? Why is this case morally important? Key FactsYour factual discovery of key events, actors, and evidence: What relevant events, people, and evidence are key to understanding the situation or problem? What contextual/ technical knowledge needs to be considered? What are your sources for the facts of the case and how reliable are they?Ethical Analysis
Your interpretation of the values conflict or moral challenge.
• What is the main moral issue in this case? What is at stake? What is the moral urgency? (Uncertainty, risk, danger)
• Who is the key moral actor in this case? Whose actions and decisions determine the moral resolution of this case?
• What is your intuitive moral judgment of the issue? What foundational moral values are involved? (CARE, LIBERTY, FAIRNESS, LOYALTY, AUTHORITY, SANCTITY)
• How do values and moral judgments conflict? Is it a right/right or right/wrong conflict? What type of right/right?
• Is the moral issue with an action, the means of action, or the intent of an action?
• What normative moral claims and standpoints of VIRTUE (character, common good), DUTY (principle, moral claims), and CONSEQUENCES (outcomes, harm, cost, benefit) should you consider in evaluating the moral challenge?
• How would you apply the values and code of your wisdom tradition to understand and explain the moral issue?
• How does the moral challenge align/conflict with the core values of your Wisdom Tradition and that of stakeholders?
Stakeholder Analysis
Your interpretation of stakeholder interests in light of precedents, context, and evidence:
Who are the stakeholders (individuals, groups, or entities) whose values, moral claims, and duties constitute the moral challenge of the case? What values, Wisdom Traditions, and moral arguments support their claims? How valid and sound are those claims?
What competing or contested values, claims, or duties complicate this case? Which stakeholders have more urgent and compelling claims? Why?
What similar cases or situations are useful as analogues for evaluating this case?
Option AnalysisYour discernment and interpretation of options (at least 2-3). What are the feasible options for the key moral actor to consider in resolving the moral problem? On what grounds are they morally justified?Decision AnalysisYour action recommendation. Which option is the most ethical, and on what grounds? How does the action express/reflect your core values? Summary ArgumentYour argument in brief: Explain the best decision option or action plan persuasively in fewer than 25 words.ReferencesAPA format: Be sure to include every idea, concept, and point of information that is not solely your original creation or observation.
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Solution
Sample Solution
Stakeholder analysis is a technique used to identify and assess the needs, interests, and influence of the people or groups who may be affected by a project or decision. It is a critical tool for project managers and decision-makers, as it helps to ensure that all stakeholders are considered and that their needs are met.
There are three main steps involved in stakeholder analysis:
- Identifying stakeholders: The first step is to identify all of the people or groups who may be affected by the project or decision. This includes both internal and external stakeholders, such as employees, customers, suppliers, regulators, and the community.
- Assessing stakeholder needs and interests: Once the stakeholders have been identified, the next step is to assess their needs and interests. This involves understanding what they want to achieve from the project or decision, as well as their concerns and priorities.
- Determining stakeholder influence: The final step is to determine the influence of each stakeholder. This involves understanding how much power or influence they have over the project or decision.
Stakeholder analysis can be used to inform a variety of decisions, such as:
- Project planning: Stakeholder analysis can be used to identify the needs and interests of stakeholders, which can then be used to inform project planning. This ensures that the project meets the needs of all stakeholders and minimizes the risk of conflict.
- Decision-making: Stakeholder analysis can be used to assess the impact of a decision on different stakeholders. This can help decision-makers to make informed decisions that take into account the needs of all stakeholders.
- Conflict resolution: Stakeholder analysis can be used to identify and resolve conflicts between different stakeholders. This can help to ensure that the project or decision is successful and that all stakeholders are satisfied.
There are a number of different techniques that can be used to conduct stakeholder analysis. Some of the most common techniques include:
- Stakeholder mapping: This technique involves creating a map of the stakeholders, their needs and interests, and their influence.
- Stakeholder interviews: This technique involves interviewing stakeholders to understand their needs and interests.
- Stakeholder surveys: This technique involves surveying stakeholders to understand their needs and interests.
Stakeholder analysis is a valuable tool for project managers and decision-makers. By understanding the needs, interests, and influence of stakeholders, project managers and decision-makers can make more informed decisions that are likely to be successful.
Here are some additional thoughts on stakeholder analysis:
- Stakeholder analysis is an ongoing process: The needs and interests of stakeholders can change over time, so it is important to regularly review stakeholder analysis.
- Stakeholder analysis is not always easy: It can be difficult to identify all of the stakeholders, assess their needs and interests, and determine their influence. However, the benefits of stakeholder analysis make it a worthwhile effort.
- Stakeholder analysis can be used to improve communication: By understanding the needs and interests of stakeholders, project managers and decision-makers can improve communication with stakeholders. This can help to build trust and cooperation, which can lead to a more successful project or decision.
