This assignment focuses on how the management practices of planning, leading, organizing, staffing, and
controlling are implemented in your workplace. Using the Ashford University Library and other credible
online resources, find three Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site.
that provide information on Amazon.com’s business structure.
Here is the scenario and situation:
Assume you are an employee working in the Amazon warehouse, and you pack orders and categorize
them into small, medium, and large batches. You are considered a packer. You have experience packing all
sizes and have been with the organization for two years. You are considered one of their best employees,
you have a solid reputation for being a hard worker, and all of your orders are packed correctly. You have
also been busy; you recently completed Amazon’s management training program, and you have completed
your BABA degree at the Forbes School of Business and Technology at Ashford University.
Congratulations: You have just been promoted to manager. You will be relocated to a new plant that is twa
hours away that employs 100 employees. You will oversee a team of 10 supervisors and 90 packers and
will now oversee the entire warehouse operation. How will you work to use and apply the five functions of
Now let’s apply the five functions. In your paper, include the following sections:
Planning: Examine the specific areas you will choose to manage that fall under the planning function.
For example, what might be some of the things you will plan to do and implement to build an effective team
and culture? People are the most important resource in any business, what do you plan to do to build a
positive team culture? What processes and systems do you plan to use?
Organizing: Assess if the present structure that Amazon has set up is working.
This move, the article contends has changed Al-Qaeda from an outer danger to an inner risk, which involves a move in counter-fear based oppression rehearses from a military to a legal reaction. 'The view that fear mongering is wrongdoing drives [states] to support legitimate solutions'. The article contends from a constructivist perspective, that psychological oppression is a social develop. Albeit ordinarily there is a specific spotlight on the fear monger entertainer when it is introduced to us in the media be that as it may, the psychological militant on-screen character is a result of talk in this manner talk is a consistent beginning stage for psychological warfare investigation. Specifically we should take a gander at the talk of the psychological oppressors' foes as it is this which impact the fear monger inspirations, procedures, authoritative structures and objectives. Accordingly, constructivist considering talk as opposed to the individual is probably going to give a progressively exact perspective on-screen character's inspirations. An examination concerning figurative developments of psychological warfare by Hulsse and Spencer in 2008 proposes that the adjustment in the manner the media built fear based oppression may be because of us 'becoming acclimated to Al Qaeda terrorism'. Fear mongering along these lines fits constructivist understanding as pictures of dread exist in various dimensions of development and the manner by which the media presents psychological oppression massively affects how states react to it. Fear based oppression maybe best fits constructivist understanding because of the disappointment of other IR speculations to comprehend the constructivist introduction of Al Qaeda and this has lead them to thought of a state driven examination of psychological oppression. A constructivist approach, on account of its multidisciplinary comprehension can give increasingly conceivable bits of knowledge about the job of standards, thoughts, time and setting in forming the connection among states and psychological oppression as non-state entertainer. Authenticity has almost no to add to the exchange of Al Qaeda as a transnational entertainer post 9/11. This is on the grounds that at authenticities center is the conviction that universal undertakings is a battle for power among self-intrigued states. Remote arrangement essayist Jack Snyder contends due to this methodology "it is troublesome for the state-driven hypothesis to clarify why the world's solitary superpower declared a war against Al Qaeda, a non-state fear based oppressor organization". Global relations essayist Burak KÜRKÇÜ that the presumptions of progressivism on fair organizations with liberal qualities and neoliberal comprehension of tranquil change with the assistance of establishments likewise neglects to satisfactorily recognize psychological militant gatherings or clarify fear monger action. A unified conclusion on the distinguishing proof of "state" on one hand, broke comprehension of characterizing fear based oppression then again makes it very hard to build up a steady ground with customary hypotheses.>GET ANSWER