Review all of the TED Talks in your group. Leave your comments in your TED Talk group folder in Google Drive. Follow the instructions given in chat.

Task 2: Draft the Research Paper
Using the outline you generated earlier, you will begin drafting your research paper. As a reminder, your final paper will be assessed on this rubric. Remember, the focus of your research paper will probably be different from the TED Talk script. The two pieces have different purposes and thus different writing styles. Do NOT try to repeat your TED Talk here. Certainly, some of the evidence may be the same, but you will write about it differently.
Step 1: Write the introduction.
Just like in other forms of writing, the introduction of the research paper should:
● Engage the reader
● Set the tone, or show the writer’s attitude toward the topic
● Clearly communicate the topic of the paper
● Include specific context and background information relevant for your topic
● Establish an argument through a debatable thesis statement
For additional resources on writing introductions see:
● Strategies from NOVA
● Strategies from George Mason University Writing Center: Writing Your First Sentence and Introductions and Conclusions for Humanities Papers
Please note that you will likely revise your introduction many times throughout the writing process. It is very hard to write a good introduction before knowing what the body of the essay says. Therefore, plan to revisit your introduction after you write the body to ensure that the two align.
Step 2: Write the body of the paper.
The body of a research paper requires the application of several writing skills, most of which we have utilized all year. Remember, the purpose of your body paragraphs is to develop and support the thesis. To do so, each paragraph will contain:
● Assertions/claims: topic sentences should reflect back to your thesis, further proving your central argument
● Evidence/quotations: quotations from the sources you researched support the claims you are making. All evidence including paraphrased, summarized, and quoted material must be properly cited using MLA format.
● Analysis/commentary: your insight, inferences, and conclusions about the topic, and in particular, how your evidence supports your assertions and claims

Each body paragraph will:
● Develop the thesis with sophisticated claims
● Clarify and defend the position with compelling and insightful evidence
● Analyze each main point of the argument
● Sustains focus on the central position (thesis)

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer