I was wondering if those who have a “tendency to ramble” in their writing think this has anything to do with an inability to come to a good conclusion? Have you had to keep writing because you did not know how to stop the paper?
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Title: The Art of Concise Writing: Finding Clarity in Conclusions
Introduction:
Writing is a powerful tool for communication, allowing us to convey ideas, arguments, and information effectively. However, some individuals may find themselves prone to rambling in their writing, struggling to arrive at a clear and concise conclusion. This essay explores the relationship between the tendency to ramble and the challenge of reaching a satisfying conclusion, shedding light on potential causes and providing strategies to overcome this issue.
Thesis Statement:
While a tendency to ramble in writing can make it challenging to reach a definitive conclusion, it is not necessarily indicative of an inability to do so. Rather, it often stems from a lack of clarity in thought organization, an insufficient understanding of the topic, or a failure to establish a clear purpose for the writing.
Body:
Lack of Thought Organization:
One common reason for rambling in writing is a lack of proper thought organization. When thoughts are not structured logically, the writer may struggle to establish clear points and develop cohesive arguments. This lack of organization can cause a meandering effect, making it difficult to reach a concise conclusion.
Insufficient Understanding of the Topic:
Another factor that contributes to rambling in writing is an insufficient understanding of the topic. If the writer lacks a comprehensive grasp of the subject matter, they may resort to excessive explanation, repetition, or tangential discussions. This can hinder the ability to come to a solid conclusion as the writer tries to compensate for their lack of knowledge.
Failure to Establish a Clear Purpose:
A clear purpose is vital for any piece of writing. Without a well-defined objective, the writer may struggle to stay focused and may inadvertently veer off-topic. Consequently, this can lead to rambling and difficulty in reaching a solid conclusion.
Strategies for Overcoming Rambling and Reaching Strong Conclusions:
Outline and organize thoughts: Before starting the writing process, create an outline to structure your ideas logically and ensure a coherent flow. This framework will help you maintain focus and guide you towards a strong conclusion.
Research and gather relevant information: Thoroughly research your topic to ensure a comprehensive understanding. By acquiring sufficient knowledge, you will be better equipped to express your thoughts concisely and confidently.
Develop a clear thesis statement: A well-crafted thesis statement provides direction for your entire paper. It helps you establish a clear purpose and ensures that your writing remains on track, ultimately leading to a more effective conclusion.
Edit and revise: After completing the initial draft, review your work critically. Trim any unnecessary information or repetitive sections that contribute to rambling. Focus on strengthening your arguments and ensuring that your conclusion aligns with your thesis statement.
Conclusion:
While a tendency to ramble in writing can impede the ability to reach a concise conclusion, it is not necessarily indicative of an inability to do so. By addressing underlying causes such as disorganized thoughts, insufficient topic understanding, and unclear purpose, writers can overcome this challenge. Employing strategies such as outlining, thorough research, strong thesis development, and diligent editing will lead to more focused and impactful writing, facilitating the creation of compelling conclusions that leave a lasting impression on readers.
