The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) leads and
coordinates national improvements in safety and quality in health care. It has developed a
framework for safe and high quality care with three core principles – that care is consumer
centred, driven by information, and organised for safety (ACSQHC, 2010).
In addition to this framework, ACSQHC have developed National Safety and Quality Health
Service (NSQHS) Standards to ‘protect the public from harm and to improve the quality of
health service provision’ (ACSQHC, 2017, p. 5). The Registered Nurse is integral to every
standard that has been developed by the ACSQHC.
This assessment is designed to enable you to demonstrate an understanding of quality and
safety in health care through the critical discussion of one of the National Safety and Quality
Health Service Standards.
This assessment will address learning outcome 2.
This task requires you to write a 2,000-word assignment. Before you write your assignment,
you will need to:
• Choose one of the following National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS)
Standards (ACSQHC, 2017) as the topic of your assignment.
• Clinical governance (Standard 1)
• Partnering with consumers (Standard 2)
• Preventing and controlling healthcare-associated infection (Standard 3)
• Comprehensive care (Standard 5)
• Communicating for safety (Standard 6)
• Blood management (Standard 7)
• Identify the type of process and outcome data that could be collected, analysed and fed
back for improvements in care relevant to your chosen standard. (You may wish to refer
to the article by Donabedian, 1988, as a starting point). This area for action aligns with
step 2.2 of the Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care (ACSQHC,
• Research the topic of quality and safety in health care in Australia then identify and
analyse scholarly literature that is relevant to your assignment topic, namelyyour:
• chosen standard,
• a clinical care activity relevant to this standard,
• process and outcome data required to monitor outcomes/improvements relevant to
The outcomes likewise propose that there is a need to consider other business related physical and psychosocial parts of sewing errands. Curiously, our discoveries demonstrated that apparent speed of work (for example quick working) was another autonomous factor that was decidedly connected with the event of MSP in all examined body districts (for example neck, shoulder and low back zones) among sewing specialists. This finding might be credited to the way that these specialists were paid dependent on the quantity of things they finished and this gave a motivating force to work at rapid without satisfactory rest breaks. In addition, the finding demonstrated that long periods of work as a sewing laborer was decidedly connected with the nearness of side effects in the neck and low back territories, which is in concurrence with a few past perceptions (Kaergaard and Andersen 2000; Wang et al. 2007; Dianat and Salimi 2014). It is likewise fascinating to take note of that the sewing specialists in this examination had visit times of long span of sewing work without breaks (for example sitting in one spot in a static or non-moving position for over 2 hours), however this was just connected with the event of neck objections. The outcomes from some past investigations recommend that the long span of sitting work without a break may build the take a huge risk/bear torment among various word related gatherings (Wang et al. 2007; Johnston et al. 2008; Dianat and Salimi 2014), and that ordinary rest breaks may decrease the hazard for such objections (McLean et al. 2001). Accordingly, sewing laborers ought to be encouraged to take ordinary rest breaks so as to limit presentation and to help recuperation from static and clumsy stances. The present examination has favorable position that the eyewitness mistake was constrained by utilizing two prepared questioners in contrast with concentrates in which there were isolated spectator for each case. Be that as it may, the discoveries displayed ought to be deciphered with regards to the cross-sectional examination plan. Furthermore, the discoveries feature the significance of both individual and business related parts of sewing assignments in relationship with MSP. Along these lines, notwithstanding the business related elements, it may be valuable to think about individual variables, (for example, age, sex and training) as potential confounders in future examination of MSP among this working gathering.>GET ANSWER