How effectively does A Dollhouse or The
Glass Menagerie capture the constructed nature of these concepts: morality, free will, gender, family,
justice (moral or legal), social class, authority.
usr primary and two secondary sources
The Constructed Nature of Morality, Free Will, Gender, Family, Justice, Social Class, and Authority in A Doll’s House and The Glass Menagerie
In the realms of literature, Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House” and Tennessee Williams’ “The Glass Menagerie” are two timeless classics that delve deep into the complexities of human nature and societal constructs. These plays effectively capture the constructed nature of various concepts such as morality, free will, gender, family, justice (moral or legal), social class, and authority. By exploring the intricacies of these themes, both playwrights offer a profound commentary on the intricacies of society and human relationships.
Thesis Statement
Through the characters and plot development in “A Doll’s House” and “The Glass Menagerie,” Henrik Ibsen and Tennessee Williams skillfully portray how morality, free will, gender roles, family dynamics, justice, social class, and authority are socially constructed concepts that significantly impact individuals’ lives.
Primary Source: “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen
Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House” is a groundbreaking play that challenges societal norms and expectations surrounding gender roles and marriage. The protagonist, Nora Helmer, initially appears to conform to the ideal image of a dutiful wife and mother. However, as the play unfolds, Nora’s struggles with her own sense of identity and autonomy come to light. Through Nora’s journey to self-discovery and eventual liberation, Ibsen effectively showcases how the concept of gender roles is a constructed societal norm that can be oppressive and limiting.
Moreover, the theme of morality is intricately woven into the narrative as Nora grapples with the moral implications of her actions and societal expectations. The play forces the audience to question traditional notions of morality and encourages reflection on the true essence of right and wrong beyond societal constructs.
Secondary Source 1: “The Glass Menagerie” by Tennessee Williams
In “The Glass Menagerie,” Tennessee Williams explores the complexities of family dynamics and the illusions individuals create to cope with reality. The Wingfield family, consisting of Amanda, Tom, and Laura, each grapples with their own desires and dreams that conflict with their roles within the family unit. Through the character of Amanda, Williams portrays how societal expectations of motherhood and femininity can create internal conflicts and perpetuate feelings of inadequacy.
Furthermore, the theme of social class is prominent in the play as the Wingfield family navigates their lower-middle-class status and dreams of upward mobility. Tom’s yearning for freedom and adventure serves as a critique of the constraints imposed by societal expectations based on social class.
Secondary Source 2: “Ibsen’s ‘A Doll’s House’.” The Explicator, vol. 64, no. 2, 2006
This scholarly analysis delves into the themes of free will and authority in “A Doll’s House.” It discusses how Nora’s ultimate decision to leave her family in search of independence highlights the importance of individual agency and autonomy. Additionally, the examination of authority figures in the play sheds light on how societal structures can suppress individual freedoms and perpetuate oppressive power dynamics.
In conclusion, both “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen and “The Glass Menagerie” by Tennessee Williams effectively capture the constructed nature of morality, free will, gender roles, family dynamics, justice, social class, and authority. Through their masterful storytelling and character development, these playwrights provide profound insights into the intricate web of societal constructs that shape human experiences and relationships.
