- Interact with The Court System – Evidence and Procedure activity to see how a criminal trial proceeds. Listen to several different people in the courtroom, and notice the different roles they play. (read document 14 first)
- Review the evidence and think about a verdict.
- Be sure to read your scoring guide and address all criteria.
-Analyze and describe one potential issue (not shown in the simulation) that could surface at any stage of the trial process (arraignment through verdict) that would impact a case.
-Describe evidentiary rules, constitutional issues, and/or possible errors that may have potential case impact in the context of the simulation.
*Admissibility of certain evidence.
*Impact of Miranda.
-Describe how each issue above may play a role in helping you (and the jury) reach a verdict.
-Determine the verdict based on the evidence in this case and explain your rationale for selecting that verdict.
business expert Charles Franklin. (Franklin, 2017) This period is marked by the increasing speed of networks to communicate and produce as well as the rise of automation. Looking forward, he writes that wealth gaps will remain unstable, with the looming prospect of a major imbalance due to the unknown future of automation (Franklin, 2017). In an article published by The Financial Express, economists also note that automation is looking to replace many human workers, which is likely to result in increase financial inequality. (The Financial Express, 2018) The Bangladeshi news agency also writes that the Fourth Industrial Revolution will result in much more efficient logistics and supply-chains as a consequence of automation. They say that the rapid growth and innovation that comes about as a result of such technological advancements may leave behind many companies that rely on only human brain-power (The Financial Express, 2018). The evidence behind a Fourth Industrial Revolution suggests that an increase in future standards for efficiency will push a portion of companies out of business as a consequence of competition. Earlier this year, Rebecca Rasch, a social scientist at the U.S. Forest Service, published a paper reviewing studies in, “An exploration of intergenerational differences in wilderness values”. (Rasch, 2018) This source points to several factors that may contribute to the differences between generations in how they feel about wild environments, resulting in both positive and negative impacts on people’s perception of such environments. As the United States develops and towns and cities encroach on what otherwise would be wild territory, the scarcity of natural environments has resulted in increased value by younger generations (Rasch, 2018). It looks as though this inverse relationship will continue to exist well into the future, or as long as the population of the country continues to grow. The paper also points out negative trends on people’s perception of the natural environment. As the prevalence of technology has habituated humans into a lack of outdoor exposure, it has been shown that people are losing the capacity to connect to natural places and attribute meaning to experiences and things in the natural environment (Rasch, 2018). In a paper published by the Vanderbilt University Law School, it is suggested that economic incentive has a greater influence on people to recycle items as opposed to the values of each household >GET ANSWER