Explain the difference between the three types of yogas in the Bhagavad Gita that are common to all religions and Provide a theory about how they can be organized into a system to work together.
ladies supported one conviction, X embraced two convictions and X embraced every one of the three convictions. To close , members answer the inquiry, "Do you see yourself as a women's activist?" indeed in a yes or no arrangement either tolerating the mark of a women's activist or not tolerating the name of a women's activist. Ladies were viewed as women's activists in the event that they embraced each of the three of the cardinal convictions and acknowledged the name of a women's activist. Ladies were viewed as egalitarians on the off chance that they embraced each of the three cardinal convictions of women's activists yet addressed no to tolerating the name of a women's activist. Ladies were considered non-women's activists on the off chance that they dismissed at any rate one cardinal conviction just as the mark of a women's activist. Technique This examination is a review directed at The College of New Jersey, where an example of female understudies were enrolled through the PIPER pool to partake. Members were tried on their dispositions towards menstrual unthinkable notices. The needy variable is self-externalization. At the point when members touched base to the assigned PC lab, they marked their name on the sign-in sheet and took a seat at a PC to start the review. There was around 15 members taking the overview in the lab alongside two specialists present all through every session. To start, all members were approached to sign an educated assent structure, which prompted them that the examination was being utilized to test their wellbeing convictions. This structure perceived all prohibition basis, potential dangers and benefits, and the reasons for the investigation. The examination was directed in a TCNJ inquire about lab and did not take longer than 30 minutes to finish. Next, a water bottle ad was seen by members pursued by two haphazardly appointed tampon notices. All promotions and messages were seen in a similar language, English. Subsequent to review the ads, introductory responses of members were surveyed through arrangement questions. In conclusion, a different overview that posed inquiries about people convictions about their bodies and their wellbeing was completed.Participants started addressing inquiries regarding the arbitrator being inspected. To evaluate the arbitrators, members finished inquiries on self-typification, menstrual information, and women's activist distinguishing proof. Extra arbitrators that will be tried all through the investigation incorporate confidence, self-perception and receptiveness to menstruation.Upon finishing of the overview, members were questioned in regards to the examination. They were then mindful that the intention is to comprehend the individual factors that can impact ladies to see feminine cycle contrarily which would at last lead ladies to self-typify. Results Because of disappointment of consideration checks, three members' reactions were barred from investigations, bringing about a last example size of 68. Members' mean self-generalization scores extended from 2.71 – 5.63 (M = 4.02, SD = .66). There were no huge contrasts in self-externalization by condition (F > 0.05). Members' mean menstrual information scores went from 0.80 (M = 0.7164, SD = 1.4418). There were no critical contrasts in menstrual learning by condition (F>0.05). Members' frames of mind toward mean monthly cycle scores went from 4.13 (M = 4.01, SD = .7075). For this variable, Cronbach's alpha was more prominent than 0.7 ( α = .752), and along these lines solid. There were no critical contrasts in mentalities toward feminine cycle by condition (F>0.05).. Enlightening insights among all factors incorporated into the examination are appeared in Table 1. At the bivariate level, it was discovered that ladies who showed more prominent state self-externalization had progressively negative frames of mind toward period. The frequencies and rates for scores on the women's activist personality measures are exhibited in Table 2. A multivariate direct relapse was led to inspect the degree to which menstrual information, unthinkable messages, and demeanors toward monthly cycle anticipate state self-externalization (see Table 3). Additionally, to test the directing impact of information on the connection between forbidden messages and self-generalization. The model represented 3.8% of the fluctuation in self-generalization, F(3, 60) = 1.832, p >.005 . Critical indicators were dispositions toward period. The individuals who had negative demeanors toward period were fundamentally bound to self-typify than the individuals who had inspirational dispositions toward feminine cycle, β = 0.285, t = 2.245, p = .029. Likewise, the individuals who revealed larger amounts of menstrual information did not significantly affect self-generalization, β = - .024, t = - 0.192, p = .849. The sort of message that was appeared (unthinkable versus non-forbidden) did not significantly affect self-typification, β = .012, t = .095, p = .925. At long last, we tried the connection among condition and menstrual information on and including the collaboration impact did not altogether improve the change represented. Hence, there was not directing impact which was conflicting with our speculation. We at that point analyzed whether ladies who are women's activists will be more averse to self-externalize because of menstrual forbidden than ladies who are egalitarians and non-women's activists by leading a 2(condition) X 3(feminist personality) factorial ANOVA to look at the consequences for self-externalization (see Table 4). Condition included two levels (unthinkable [N=33] versus non forbidden [N=35]) and women's activist character comprised of three levels (women's activist, libertarian, and non-women's activist). The ANOVA uncovered that there was no fundamental impact of condition on self-generalization , F(1,65) = .104, p = .749, proposing that ladies who were in the unthinkable condition (M = 4.045, SD = .138) did not vary in state-self externalization in contrast with the non-forbidden condition (M = 3.981, SD = .143). The ANOVA uncovered that there was no principle impact of women's activist personality on self-generalization, F(2,65) = .487, p = .617, proposing that non-women's activists (M = 4.161, SD = .204), egalitarians (M = 3.888, SD = .192) and women's activists (M = 3.990, SD = .105) did not vary on self-externalization. There was likewise no noteworthy connection between the two components, F(1,65) = .525, p = .757. The idea of this association recommended that for non-women's activists , forbidden messages>GET ANSWER