There are numerous discussions involving the Electoral College. There are some people that want to abolish the electoral college while others want to keep it. What do you think? Keep the electoral college or abolish it? Explain the reasons for your choice.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
The Electoral College: To Abolish or Maintain?
Thesis Statement
While the Electoral College has its roots in the founding principles of American democracy, it is increasingly out of step with modern democratic values and practices, making a compelling case for its abolition in favor of a direct popular vote system that better reflects the will of the people.
Introduction
The Electoral College, established by the U.S. Constitution in 1787, was designed as a compromise between electing the President by a vote in Congress and through direct popular vote. However, as the political landscape has evolved, so too have the arguments surrounding the necessity and fairness of this system. Proponents argue that it protects the interests of smaller states and maintains a federalist structure, while opponents contend that it undermines the principle of one-person, one-vote. This essay will explore these arguments and ultimately advocate for the abolition of the Electoral College in favor of a direct popular vote.
Historical Context
The founding fathers created the Electoral College as a means to balance power among various states and to mitigate the potential for mob rule. At the time, they were particularly concerned with the influence of populous states overshadowing smaller ones. However, this rationale has diminished over the years as the United States has grown into a more cohesive nation with an increasingly interconnected populace.
Arguments Against the Electoral College
1. Disenfranchisement of Voters
One of the most significant criticisms of the Electoral College is that it effectively disenfranchises voters in states with a clear majority for one political party. For instance, if a candidate wins 51% of the votes in a state, they receive all of that state’s electoral votes, leaving those who voted for other candidates without representation. This winner-takes-all approach can lead to scenarios where millions of votes are rendered inconsequential.
2. Mismatch Between Popular Vote and Election Outcome
The Electoral College has led to several instances where a candidate wins the presidency without winning the popular vote, such as in the elections of 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016. This not only raises questions about the legitimacy of such elections but also breeds disillusionment among voters who feel their voices do not matter in a system that can overlook their collective preferences.
3. Overemphasis on Swing States
The current system incentivizes candidates to focus their campaigns on a handful of swing states while ignoring those with predictable outcomes. This creates an unequal political landscape where voters in battleground states wield more influence over national elections than voters in states where one party dominates. Such a strategy undermines the notion of equal representation.
Arguments for Maintaining the Electoral College
1. Protection of Minority Interests
Proponents argue that the Electoral College helps protect the interests of smaller or less populous states by ensuring they have a voice in national elections. This was particularly relevant in the early days of the republic when there was a fear that larger states could dominate political discourse.
2. Promotion of Federalism
Supporters also claim that the Electoral College reinforces federalism by encouraging candidates to engage with a diverse electorate across different regions, rather than just focusing on urban centers where populations are more concentrated.
Conclusion
While there are arguments both for and against the Electoral College, it is clear that its continued existence raises more problems than it solves in today’s political climate. The principles of democracy demand that every citizen’s vote holds equal weight in determining their government. Abolishing the Electoral College would not only rectify issues of disenfranchisement and mismatched outcomes but would also foster greater engagement among voters nationwide. A direct popular vote system would ensure that every vote matters equally, thereby strengthening democracy in America and restoring faith in its electoral processes.
In conclusion, rather than clinging to an outdated system designed for a different era, it is time for America to move forward toward a more equitable method of electing its leaders: through a direct popular vote.
