The Great Debate: Perspectives on Climate Change

by | May 8, 2024 | environmental studies

 

Please use the people in the story and create dialogue for them on there opinions on this , this article needs to BIAS. don’t use ai make it flow.
the rubric ‘Headline is clever, accurate, and reflects the story and contains accurate verbs.
Organization: Story uses inverted pyramid, LQTQ effectively and clearly without seeming overly formulaic.
Lead: is focused, appropriate and draws the reader into the story.
Writing: has transitions that keep the reader moving smoothly through the end. Quotes are used for emphasis and emotions. The ending not only provides a kicker, but provides closure.
Objectivity and Accuracy: All facts are accurate. The writer makes no opinion statements or editorializing. And the story is written in third person’
Follows AP style accurately. Adheres to convention rules and publication-specific guidelines. Strong use of active verbs and correct attribution of quotes.
Conducts effective interviews, asking insightful open ended questions and actively listens to interviewee responses with an ability to offer appropriate follow up questions. Demonstrates empathy and professionalism in setting up and following up with the interviewer
here is the link to what i have so far: https://docs.google.com/file/d/10_fkhAQjGF1F_wQIrGmiM8aC1tvHZsRC/edit?usp=docslist_api&filetype=msword

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Title: The Great Debate: Perspectives on Climate Change

Climate change has become a topic of heated debate across the globe, with individuals holding varying opinions on its causes and implications. Through insightful interviews with key figures in the environmental, political, and scientific spheres, this article aims to shed light on the diverse perspectives surrounding this critical issue.

Lead:
As the world grapples with the effects of climate change, opinions on the matter diverge sharply. From policymakers to activists, each voice adds a unique dimension to the ongoing discourse.

People’s Opinions:

Dr. Sarah Thompson, Environmental Scientist:
Dr. Thompson emphasizes the urgency of addressing climate change, stating, “The scientific evidence is clear – human activities are significantly contributing to global warming. We must take immediate action to mitigate its impact on our planet.”

Senator John Richards, Political Leader:
Senator Richards takes a different stance, arguing, “While environmental conservation is important, we cannot ignore the economic implications of drastic climate policies. We need to strike a balance between sustainability and economic growth.”

Amy Miller, Climate Change Activist:
Miller passionately asserts, “We cannot afford to wait any longer. Our future is at stake, and we must hold governments and corporations accountable for their role in exacerbating climate change. The time for action is now.”

Ending:
In conclusion, the debate on climate change rages on, with each perspective offering valuable insights into this complex issue. As we navigate towards a sustainable future, it is imperative to listen to diverse viewpoints and collaborate towards effective solutions that benefit both our planet and its inhabitants.

By incorporating the voices of key stakeholders in the climate change dialogue, this article strives to illuminate the multifaceted nature of this pressing global challenge. As we confront the realities of a changing climate, it is crucial to engage in productive conversations that pave the way for meaningful action and positive change.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer