- What is one, specific thing you learned about the history of advertising that you did not know before?
Was this surprising to you? Why or why not?
- What is your view about having your information freely available online? Should there be limits on what
information companies can gather? Or, is having your information freely available online part of the cost of
having an online life?
Explain why you feel this way.
What type of information would you be most worried about having shared?
- Based on the readings and videos about the history of advertising this week, what do you think is one of the
most significant changes in advertising in the last 100 years? (This could be a change in ads themselves or a
change in the world or media environment that impacted advertising.)
Why do you select this particular change as one of the most significant?
reading: Sheehan, K. (2014). Controversies in Contemporary Advertising (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications Inc.
Socrates and Crito 8 Pages 2074 Words Subject: Does Socrates persuade you (as he appears to have convinced Crito) that an understanding obliges him to stay in Athens and face execution? Crito is an exchange among Socrates and the title character in which the two men talk about whether Socrates ought to or ought not endeavor to escape from an execution condemned by the territory of Athens. The scene is set a couple of days before the genuine execution of Socrates is planned to occur. Crito approaches Socrates in his jail cell and endeavors to convince him into fleeing with the financial and physical assistance of Crito and Socrates' different companions and admirers. Crito gives various reasons why Socrates should flee basing his reasons around how Socrates ought to maintain a strategic distance from hurt (for example by fleeing, Socrates will abstain from hurting his companions and their notoriety, his youngsters, etc). Socrates is confronted with settling on a choice in a restricted measure of time (for example the choice to flee). Socrates dismisses Crito's purposes behind fleeing, and afterward presents his own contentions regarding why fleeing would submit an improper demonstration. Before Socrates starts his two contentions, Crito yields to Socrates' attestation that in the event that two gatherings have gone to an arrangement, at that point the understanding must consistently be held. By not maintaining the understanding, one gathering is making hurt the other. Also, both Socrates and Crito accept that it is never right to hurt another, in any circumstance. Socrates at that point starts to discuss his relationship with the laws. He expresses that if he somehow managed to flee, he would obliterate the laws since he would leave the laws proportional to nothing. If Socrates somehow happened to guarantee that the city had violated him, and its choice was wrong, the laws would answer that there was an understanding among Socrates and the country of Athens (and its resulting laws) which the two players had consented to and as an outcome, the arrangement expected Socrates to stay in jail and carry out his punishment...>GET ANSWER