confucius continues to seek for understanding. he appears to be very petty, clannish, and small-minded. furthermore, he can be worldly, studious and humane. this can be regular with plato’s perspectives. most societies and culture strives for goodness, and leaders have his or her primary commonalities for personal behavior, which can be seen in vi. 28. this saying compares to socrates. confucius, too, desires to spread the information to absolutely everyone. he needs each person to be properly, now not simply himself. ultimately, every other distinguished discern within the global of philosophy is plato. plato’s writings including apology display dramatic bills of the events main to his death, as well as illustrating matters of worries, moral dwelling, and readability of notion and expression. “apology” manner “criminal defense of trial.” plato offers to speak about approximately the protection of philosophy as a manner of existence. a soul is a part of a life, while, the soul determines the matters we do ordinary. phaedo illustrates important arguments for personal immortality. in phaedo, plato argued that the soul is “some thing”, rather than a sense of “harmony.” not like harmony, the soul exists, that is extra energetic than others. souls are extra virtuous, which harmony does not pertain to. soul pre-exists which harmony does now not. alternatively, if soul is in a group of harmony, all souls could be too, which isn't always viable. therefore, soul is a sort of material, which is an awful lot greater than harmony. another argument that plato makes may be visible inside the “republic.” he argued that the soul is split in three components, and each component is a sort of choice. respectively, these dreams are rational, appetitive, or spirited. to be virtuous one ought to understand what is the useful. he or she should have the spirited wants to be knowledgeable well, in an effort to ultimately cause the safety from the soul. plato illustrates the education of the soul in books ii and iii. importantly, a virtuous character learns to stay by using a higher surroundings while he's younger, and actions directly to create virtuous behaviors. his moves are advanced whilst he's growing and learns why the factor he's doing is right. once he has learned the coolest, then he might understand why his movements were virtuous. looking back at plato’s arguments, he argues that distinctive feature really shows one to behave in different approaches. these philosophers disagree about having an appropriate reasons. they are exceptional in which the virtuous traits of a man or woman fluctuate from their dreams and emotions. philosophers together with plato and aristotle argued that the cognitive and affective states were vital. . these philosophers agree that happiness links to virtue. they recommended all people who's glad is one who is brave, restraint, and expertise. however, it is difficult to recognize. plato and aristotle each agree that a high quality moral individual includes more than a socrates’ knowledge of the advanced. each agree that it is crucial to have harmony among the cognitive and the affective materials from someone. these philosophers have numerous comparisons. they agree that the good life of a human includes nature. people look to the improvement of man or woman powers. furthermore, they agree that human exact includes corrective movements, and a person can manual his actions with the aid of the right selection, regardless of of any barriers in advance. after analyzing these philosophers and their arguments, i've concluded that aristotle has the more compelling description for growing a moral person. aristotle develops a extra in-intensity argument for his factors. he substantiates his points with passion and splendor. however, it calls for sturdy awareness and a deeper knowledge of what he is attempting to mention. in my view, i locate aristotle to be clearer, and extra difficult. i also locate that the more modern teachings of aristotle to be greater expertise than those of the japanese teachings. possibly, these involve numerous standards while western teachings are concerned. aristotle contribute greatly to the numerous subjects of philosoph>