The Illusion of a Post-9/11 World: Continuity in US Foreign Policy
Apparently, according to political pundits, we live now in a post-911 world, where we are ever more vigilant in thwarting terror and also more active fighting terror. But are we really? Yes, sure America was hit with a deadly terror attack that killed thousands but what happened after, was it really something new? Something that we get to label as "post?" After 911 we attacked Afghanistan and then Iraq and then Libya and now Syria. We fight/fought "new" enemies such as Al Qaeda and ISIS or ISIL or Daesh or whatever you want to call them. Is ISIS gone? Who are these folk we are fighting? Who are we fighting now? Are they new? Has really much changed from our policies that began with the Age of Imperialism? Were we committing similar military actions during the Spanish/American War? Guantanamo Bay, built the year of the Spanish/American War, remains in Cuba. Are those we term "terrorists" still locked up there? Why or why not do we "live in a post-911 world?"
The Illusion of a Post-9/11 World: Continuity in US Foreign Policy
The term "post-9/11 world" has been widely used to describe the current state of affairs after the devastating terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, in the United States. It implies a significant shift in global politics and the adoption of new strategies to combat terrorism. However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that the so-called "post-9/11 world" is not as distinct or transformative as it is often portrayed. Rather, it reveals a continuity in US foreign policy that dates back to the Age of Imperialism and persists to this day.
The Persistence of Military Interventionism
One of the key arguments against the notion of a post-9/11 world is the continued pattern of military interventions by the United States. While the attacks on 9/11 did prompt a direct response in the form of the invasion of Afghanistan to dismantle Al Qaeda and remove the Taliban from power, subsequent military actions in Iraq, Libya, and Syria raise questions about the uniqueness of this era. These interventions were not solely driven by counterterrorism efforts but were influenced by geopolitical considerations, such as regime change and resource control.
The Evolving Nature of Enemy Combatants
The identification of new enemy combatants, such as Al Qaeda and ISIS, is often cited as evidence for the transformational nature of the post-9/11 world. However, upon closer examination, it becomes clear that these groups are not entirely new phenomena. The roots of Al Qaeda can be traced back to the Soviet-Afghan War in the 1980s, where the United States supported Afghan mujahideen fighters against Soviet forces. Similarly, ISIS emerged as a result of the power vacuum created in Iraq following the US-led invasion in 2003. Thus, while their names and organizational structures may have changed, the underlying causes and dynamics remain deeply rooted in historical contexts.
The Persistence of Detention Facilities like Guantanamo Bay
Another aspect that challenges the idea of a post-9/11 world is the continued existence of detention facilities like Guantanamo Bay. Despite being established during the Spanish-American War in 1898, Guantanamo Bay remains operational to this day. The existence of this facility raises questions regarding the treatment of individuals labeled as "terrorists" and the erosion of civil liberties in the name of national security. This continuity suggests that policies and practices associated with counterterrorism efforts have not fundamentally changed.
The Complexities of Defining Terrorism
The term "terrorism" itself is complex and politically charged. Its definition varies depending on perspective and context. Consequently, labeling individuals or groups as terrorists can be subjective and prone to misuse. This further complicates the notion of living in a post-9/11 world since terrorism, as a tactic, has been employed throughout history by both state and non-state actors.
In conclusion, while the events of 9/11 were undoubtedly significant and had far-reaching consequences, it is misleading to portray the current era as a distinct "post-9/11 world." The continuities in US foreign policy, including military interventions, evolving enemy combatants, persistent detention facilities, and the complexities surrounding terrorism itself, suggest a more nuanced understanding of global politics. Rather than being a break from the past, the post-9/11 era reflects an evolution within a broader historical continuum shaped by imperialism, geopolitical interests, and shifting definitions of security.