- Explore the information systems and their applications in your current (or past) healthcare organization.
- What are the main systems used?
- How is data shared among systems?
- What examples of functional, structural, and semantic interoperability can you identify?
- Is there a human–technology interface that you have encountered that you think needs improvement? If you were to design a replacement, which analysis techniques would you choose? Why?
- Is the workflow surrounding technology usage providing the healthcare organization with the data it needs to make decisions and eventually meet MACRA criteria?
THINK about and work through the questions above, and then use the textbook and online resources to compose your response to each question individually. Remember to provide citations to acknowledge the sources of the information. Make sure you give rationale (scientific evidence and/or your clinical observation) that supports your conclusion.
uth commissions and the weaknesses surrounding them such as being “ineffectual or dangerous” (Brahm, 2007. Pp. 16). Brahm thus emphasizes on the need for a multimethod approach, which he believes will help address these issues and suggests that in order to assess the impact of truth commissions, one must examine their influence on human right practices and democratic developments (Brahm, 2007. Pp. 16). ADD MORE AFTER When examining the impact of truth commissions, Brahm forms numerous arguments of cases in which they have failed to work and writes little on the occasions where they have been successful, making the chapter bias to an extent. Examples of failures include, the fall of commissions due to lack of funds in Bolivia and the Philippines, as well as Haiti and Uganda where reports were not given a wide release (Brahm, 2007. Pp. 18). The same can be said for most literatures surrounding truth commissions where majority of their failures are highlighted, evident through the works of Allison Bisset (2012), who argues that the current approach truth commissions undertake is limiting their success, “which in some cases results in conflict and makes it impossible to achieve successful prosecutions” (Bisset, 2012. Pp. 6). This mirrors much of Brahm’s argument as he suggest that a different strategy (multimethod) be taken due to the current plan appearing poor. However, it can be argued that Brahms research on truth commissions is distinctive since his work solely focuses on the impacts, failures, and successes of truth commissions and does not stray from that topic, contrary to alternative papers on truth commissions and transnational justice. Where many intellects engage in great debates surrounding truth commissions and transnational justice such as controversy on whether justice equates to punishment and if further resources should be put into victim needs as opposed to charging offenders, Brahm sticks to his purpose and does not waver. Unlike many other scholars in the field, support for the multi-method approach is minimal in contrast to Brahm’s love for the strategy as he uses the approach to confront issues from human rights to democracy. About Essay Sauce>GET ANSWER