The Inside Out Approach: Addressing Concerns about Intolerance and Sexual Ethics in Christianity
Use the “Inside Out” approach from chapter 10 of Apologetics at the Cross to respond to the following statement posed to you by a secular friend: “My biggest problem with Christianity is, for one, that Christians seem so intolerant and judgmental. And secondly, their sexual ethic seems to suppress basic human desires and our freedom to live fulfilled lives.” Remember to start inside their own plausibility structures and work to the explanatory power of the gospel. Make sure you thoroughly study the notes pertaining to this method as well as Keller’s section on A and B beliefs. Your essay must reflect, clearly explicate, and apply the central components of the “Inside Out” model as you engage your secular friend.
Title: The Inside Out Approach: Addressing Concerns about Intolerance and Sexual Ethics in Christianity
Introduction: In engaging with our secular friends, it is crucial to understand their concerns and address them in a way that resonates with their own worldview. Two common objections raised against Christianity are the perceived intolerance and judgmental attitude of Christians, as well as the belief that Christian sexual ethics suppress basic human desires and hinder fulfillment. By utilizing the “Inside Out” approach, we can delve into their plausibility structures and demonstrate the explanatory power of the gospel to overcome these objections.
I. Understanding the Concerns:
A. Intolerance and Judgment:
Acknowledge the perception: Many individuals observe that some Christians may come across as intolerant and judgmental.
Highlight the desire for acceptance: People naturally seek acceptance and inclusivity, and when they encounter Christians who appear judgmental, it creates a negative impression.
B. Suppression of Basic Human Desires:
Recognize the importance of desire: Human desires are an essential aspect of our existence, contributing to our sense of fulfillment and happiness.
Emphasize the concern for freedom: The belief is that Christian sexual ethics restrict personal freedom and limit choices, leading to an unfulfilled life.
II. The Inside Out Approach:
A. Clarifying Misconceptions:
Christians as imperfect representatives: Acknowledge that Christians are not exempt from imperfections or biases, which may lead to actions contrary to the teachings of Christ.
Differentiating between Christian principles and personal behavior: Highlight that human fallibility can sometimes blur the distinction between Christian teachings and individual actions.
B. Explaining the Source:
The message of love and acceptance: Christianity’s core message revolves around love, acceptance, and forgiveness, as witnessed in Christ’s teachings and actions.
Reconciling justice and compassion: The call to uphold moral standards should be balanced with compassion, empathy, and humility.
C. The Gospel’s Transformative Power:
Addressing intolerance and judgment: The transformative power of the gospel enables Christians to mirror Christ’s love and acceptance towards others, fostering a more inclusive and compassionate community.
Redefining fulfillment through sexual ethics: Christian sexual ethics aim to promote healthy relationships, respect, and self-control, which contribute to long-term fulfillment rather than transient desires.
III. A and B Beliefs:
A. A Beliefs (Secular Worldview):
Encourage self-reflection: Ask your friend to consider whether their own worldview allows for intolerance or judgment in different contexts.
Highlight inconsistencies: Point out instances where society itself imposes restrictions on certain behaviors deemed harmful or unacceptable.
B. B Beliefs (Christian Worldview):
Emphasize personal responsibility: Christian sexual ethics encourage individuals to make choices aligned with their faith, acknowledging the importance of self-control and commitment.
Illustrate the benefits: Highlight studies indicating healthier relationships, lower rates of sexually transmitted infections, and increased emotional intimacy within marriages adhere to Christian sexual ethics.
Conclusion:
By employing the “Inside Out” approach, we can address concerns about intolerance and sexual ethics in Christianity while remaining respectful of our secular friend’s worldview. Recognizing the perception of intolerance and explaining the transformative power of the gospel allows us to challenge misconceptions and demonstrate how Christian beliefs align with personal fulfillment and societal well-being. Through open dialogue and understanding, we can bridge the gap between differing worldviews and encourage a more nuanced understanding of Christianity.