The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: An Evaluation of Police Patrol Strategies

    Briefly summarize the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment. Are the implications of the results still current today? Should they be relied on to make patrol allocation and distribution decisions in modern cities and communities? Why or why not? Fully explain your position.      
        The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: An Evaluation of Police Patrol Strategies The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment was a landmark study conducted in the 1970s that aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different police patrol strategies on crime prevention and public safety. The experiment, which began in 1972 and lasted for over a year, divided the city into three groups: one with traditional reactive policing, one with increased police presence through preventive patrols, and one with limited police presence. The results of the experiment were surprising. Researchers found that the level of reported crime and the public's perception of safety remained relatively unchanged across all three groups. This challenged the conventional wisdom that more police presence and preventive patrols would lead to lower crime rates and increased public satisfaction. Implications of the Results The implications of the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment are still relevant today, as they shed light on the complex relationship between police presence and crime prevention. The findings suggest that simply increasing the number of patrol officers may not necessarily result in reduced crime rates or improved public safety. While the study was conducted several decades ago, its lessons are still valuable for modern cities and communities. Police departments should consider a more nuanced approach to patrol allocation and distribution, focusing on data-driven strategies, community policing, and targeted interventions in high-crime areas. Should the Results Be Relied on for Modern Decisions? While the results of the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment provide valuable insights, they should not be relied upon as the sole basis for making patrol allocation decisions in modern cities and communities. Policing strategies have evolved significantly since the 1970s, with advancements in technology, community engagement, and data analysis. Modern police departments face diverse challenges such as cybercrime, terrorism, and social unrest, which require a multifaceted approach to law enforcement. While preventive patrols may not be the panacea for reducing crime rates, they can still have a deterrent effect and contribute to building trust between law enforcement agencies and the community. Therefore, while the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment serves as a cautionary tale against blindly increasing police presence without clear objectives, it should be complemented by contemporary research, best practices, and community input when making patrol allocation decisions in modern cities and communities. A balanced approach that combines preventive patrols with community engagement, data analysis, and targeted interventions is crucial for effective policing in the 21st century.  

Sample Answer