In addition, there could also potentially be an argument made that The Weinstein Company acted negligently by continuing to employ Harvey Weinstein despite having knowledge of multiple allegations against him. For example, if executives were aware of non-disclosure agreements being signed between the company and victims yet did not take action nor investigate any further into these claims – thus allowing potential criminal behaviour go unpunished - this could suggest willful blindness on behalf those management positions concerned (Brembs et al., 2019). Furthermore depending severity charges brought against accused parties chances success being achieved end desired outcomes reached can vary greatly over timescale set initially outset tasks allocated . Ultimately though while determining whether employer acted negligently quite complex process requires look each individual situation carefully , essential remember companies must take steps protect employees put place measures dealing complaints raised properly providing necessary support anyone affected whenever possible . Taking into account various socio economic political issues surrounding particular areas focus pay attention easy access information sources possible addressing concerns raised stakeholders before putting plans action prove invaluable terms organisational success long run . By doing so executives increase chance success being achieved end desired outcomes reached accordingly

Sample Solution

The Weinstein Company’s alleged negligence in the hiring and continual employment of Harvey Weinstein is a difficult question to answer, as it is dependent on the specific facts of this case. Legally speaking, in order to establish that an employer was negligent for hiring or retaining an employee who then sexually harasses another individual, it must be proven that the company knew or should have known about the employee's propensity for such misconduct (Reddy & Kaspi 2017). Therefore, if sufficient evidence exists to show that The Weinstein Company had reason to believe that Harvey Weinstein posed a risk of sexual harassment prior to his employment and failed to act accordingly, then they could potentially be found guilty of negligence.