For this discussion, answer A and B for your initial response, and then respond to two peers. Read the following essay.
A. Murray, D. (2014) The maker’s eye: Revising your own writing. In G.H. Muller (Ed.), The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues Across the Disciplines pp. 109-113. New York. NY: McGraw-Hill. p. 113, “Writing,” Question 3: Writing an Argument: Murray suggests that revision is actually “fun” (paragraph 24).
Do you agree or disagree? Write [a response] defending your position.
Be sure to quote and cite Murray when writing your response.
Read the article carefully. Answer the question associated with the reading. (150+ words)
B. Next, describe your process in revising your paper. Did you begin with higher order (content, sources, organization) or lower order (grammar, word choice) concerns? What was the largest challenge in completing the task? What one thing about research do you believe is still challenging? What one thing did you learn that you are most proud of?
someone else is making the choice for them. Battin claims that no act is fully rational with coercion (131).Â This demonstrates that suicide by force could not be rational because if you are being forced with no other options then there is no way that could fully be your decision. Battin also reinforces this in which one of her criteria is that it should meet the interests of that individual (Williams, cited in Battin 1995, 146). Also, both of these points fail the criteria of ability to reason, in which they can move from premises to conclusion (Battin 133). If the individual is being forced or influenced by others, then they cannot figure out the premises or conclusion by themselves. If suicide is forced or not their decision, then it does not meet their interests but the interests of others, demonstrating that suicide in that regards could not be rational. One objection to my argument could be that the person was able to make those decisions by themselves even if they were coerced or influenced by anothe>GET ANSWER