This assignment has two readings; use the Moore reading, “On the Signification of Doors,” for your answer to part 1.
First, read Hutton’s article starting on page 41 with "In the Mexican Revolution..." and end on page 42: "...come to grips with his Zapata". In Mexican history, Zapata is the hero of the peasants.
Hutton makes the following remark about Orozco’s Zapata: "It is this ambiguity to which most American critics objected, lamenting the absence of a 'key' by which to interpret the work" (42). For Hutton, Orozco’s Zapata is vague and does not offer a clear understanding.
1) Do you agree or disagree with Hutton? How so? Answer Hutton’s remark taking into consideration the observations on doors made by Moore and with the knowledge that you already have on the Mexican Revolution. For this part, do the following:
a) State whether you agree or disagree with Hutton and why.
b) Elaborate on the why of your stance and use Moore’s reading to further defend your argument. Parts (a) and (b) should consist of at least twenty-five sentences.
2) Browse through the pictures you have taken with your cell and see if there are any pictures in which there’s a door present (perhaps the door wasn’t the focal point, but it is part of the picture nonetheless). Describe the possible significance of the door and its connection with the picture taken. If there's no door in your pictures, then focus on a household door. Ten sentences will help you come up with a good and decent comment.
This assignment is worth 5 points but only if you complete both parts and respond with a minimum of thirty sentences overall.
Part 1:
a) I disagree with Hutton’s remark about Orozco’s Zapata. While Hutton finds the ambiguity of the artwork problematic, I believe that the lack of a clear interpretation is precisely what makes it powerful and thought-provoking. Art, especially in the context of revolution and social movements, often thrives on ambiguity and multiple meanings.
b) To further defend my argument, I will draw upon Moore’s reading on the signification of doors. Moore argues that doors are significant because they serve as a threshold between different spaces and symbolize transitions. In the case of Orozco’s Zapata, the ambiguity of the artwork can be seen as a metaphorical door, inviting viewers to explore different interpretations and perspectives.
The Mexican Revolution was a complex and multifaceted event, with various factions and ideologies at play. Orozco’s artwork captures this complexity by presenting Zapata in a way that is both heroic and enigmatic. By leaving room for interpretation, Orozco allows viewers to engage with the artwork on a deeper level and encourages them to grapple with the complexities of the revolution.
Furthermore, Moore discusses how doors can represent opportunities for transformation and change. In the context of Orozco’s Zapata, the ambiguity of the artwork can be seen as an invitation for viewers to reflect on their own understanding of revolution and social change. The lack of a “key” to interpret the work is not a flaw but rather an invitation for viewers to actively engage with the artwork and explore their own perspectives.
In conclusion, I disagree with Hutton’s remark about Orozco’s Zapata. The ambiguity of the artwork is not a weakness but a strength, allowing for multiple interpretations and encouraging viewers to engage with the complexities of the Mexican Revolution. Moore’s observations on doors further support this argument by highlighting the significance of ambiguity and exploration in art.
Part 2:
Upon browsing through my cell phone pictures, I found a picture that includes a door as part of the composition. The picture was taken during a trip to a historic town, and the door is a prominent feature in the foreground. The significance of the door in this picture lies in its connection to the town’s rich history and cultural heritage.
The door in the picture is weathered and worn, showing signs of age and decay. This visual element symbolizes the passage of time and the historical significance of the place. It evokes a sense of nostalgia and invites viewers to reflect on the stories and events that have unfolded within the town.
Furthermore, the door serves as a portal between the outside world and the interior space of the building. It represents a threshold between different realms, inviting viewers to imagine what lies beyond. This element of mystery adds depth to the picture and encourages viewers to engage with their imagination.
Additionally, the door’s architectural details, such as its intricate carvings and unique design, speak to the craftsmanship and artistry of the past. It serves as a reminder of the skills and techniques that were employed in constructing such doors, showcasing the cultural heritage and traditions of the town.
Overall,
the presence of the door in this picture adds layers of meaning and significance to the composition. It invites viewers to reflect on the town’s history, imagine what lies beyond, and appreciate the craftsmanship of the past. The door acts as a symbol that connects the present with the past and invites viewers to explore their own interpretations and connections.