Create a 15- to 20-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes for a staff training meeting on the pathophysiology and pharmacologic agents for the select disease process. Tuberculosis
Describe the physiology and pathophysiology of the disease, clinical manifestations, and evaluation (e.g., labs, imaging).
Describe the pharmacologic treatment of the disease, including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, side effects, adverse reactions, and application of the nursing process in monitoring the drug therapy.
Part II: Educational Resource
Using your selected disease process from Part I, develop an educational resource that can assist staff in increasing patient knowledge of medications and medication compliance.
The vehicle for your educational resource could include pamphlets, handouts, or any other brief, concise medium to convey the information to staff.
APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected with 3-5 current references
A description of physiology and pathophysiology of the disease, clinical manifestations, and evaluation is present. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
A description of pharmacologic treatment of the disease, including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, side effects, adverse reactions, and application of the nursing process in monitoring drug therapy is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
An educational resource that can assist staff in increasing patient knowledge of medications and medication compliance is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
amount will be paid through contrary parties no. 1 to four to the complainant within the following way: Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee shall pay a sum of Rs.4040000/- (Rupees forty Lakh 40 Thousand only) i.e. [Rs.3890000/- towards compensation and Rs.150000/- as cost of litigation]; Dr. Baidyanth Halder shall pay a sum of Rs. 2693000/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lakh 90 three Thousand only) i.e. [Rs. 2593000/- towards compensation and Rs.100000/- as cost of litigation]; AMRI health center shall pay a sum of Rs. 4040000/- (Rupees forty Lakh 40 Thousand most effective ) i.e. [Rs. 3890000/- towards compensation and Rs.150000/- as cost of litigation]; and Dr. Balram Prasad shall pay a sum of Rs. 2693000/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lakh 90 three Thousand best) i.e. [Rs. 2593000/- towards compensation and Rs.100000/- as cost of litigation]. the other events had been directed to pay the aforesaid quantities to the complainant inside a period of eight weeks from the date of this order (21.10.2011), failing which the quantity shall carry hobby @ 12% p.a. w.e.f. the date of default. III. important analysis: The very best court docket’s ancient factor judgment inside the scientific negligence case referring to Anuradha Saha is being talked about as watershed development. The excellent court’s choice to honor round Rs 11 crore as compensation to the offended birthday party of the 15-year-antique Anuradha Saha medical negligence case is welcome. The judgment and the compensation quantity – the most noteworthy in India – highlights the issue of increasing medical negligence within the country and need to serve as a deterrent in similar instances. There’s no denying that India’s social insurance division is healthy as a fiddle. whilst public recuperation facilities and facilities enjoy the ill results of a woeful absence of infrastructure, personal service providers had been blamed for profiteering and different exploitative practices. A frail administrative administration has prompted the ascent of an unholy nexus between professionals, restoration centers and analytic offerings. Henceforth, patients are left helpless before a bent framework with couple of choices. In any such state of affairs, it seems to be extraordinarily tough for casualties and their relatives to illustrate instances of medical negligence. Given the specialised way of the scientific calling, careless demonstrations of exclusion or fee have to be confirmed by means of kindred professionals who barely ever bolster the patient. similarly, casualties assume that reporting times of misbehavior will deny them treatment in destiny. sooner or later, on this skewed physician-affected person courting it’s the responsibility of the framework to make certain the final mentioned. improved economic repayment for established instances of medical negligence is a useful method for offsetting the force mathematical announcement between wellbeing service providers and conventional subjects. The contention that this will make experts to a extraordinary diploma mindful and enlarge remedy fees for patients doesn’t reduce ice. while there’s a strong case for expanding medical coverage objects and offerings at some point of the nation, the price of scientific negligence for casualties and their families is a ways more noteworthy. minimum attempt healthcare can’t be an alternative to exceptional healthcare. The Anuradha Saha judgment puts the onus of safety, appropriate conclusion and treatment on the expert – because it ought to be – as opposed to the affected person.>GET ANSWER