Apply the concepts of power and politics as presented in Bolman and Deal (2013) to possible organizational changes in one of the following federal agencies – OMB, EPA, Department or Education or U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Comment on past and future use of power in the selected agency.
In your response, post a link to an article, YouTube video, or some other electronic resource that explores power and its use as a key organizational resource.
What important lessons have you learned about power and the political frame? Read this article link: https://cdn.govexec.com/b/interstitial.html?
The Enlightenment, an intellectual movement that substantially encouraged scientific and social thinking of the eighteenth century, turned into exposed to a profound analysis by way of Immanuel Kant who related the concept of enlightenment with private freedom, considering over ‘non-public’ and ‘public’ usage of purpose, and Moses Mendelssohn who brought the notions ‘civil enlightenment’ and ‘human enlightenment’ to differentiate between social and individual expertise of enlightenment. while Kant looked for the ways to obtain a balance among public and personal utilization of cause, Mendelssohn paid interest to the variations among human and civil enlightenment, revealing the difficulties of obtaining this stability. however, of their definitions of enlightenment both Kant, the follower of the German Enlightenment, and Mendelssohn, the originator of the Haskalah, the Enlightenment of Jews, exposed “the anxiety between the agenda of enlightenment and the exigencies of society” (Schmidt five). Making an attempt to offer his definition of the Enlightenment within the essay “Answering the question: what's Enlightenment?” written as a response to the Reverend Zollner, Immanuel Kant states that “enlightenment is man’s launch from his self-incurred tutelage” (eighty three). accordingly, consistent with Kant, enlightenment is finished through personal freedom that is not possible to accumulate with out such essential human tendencies as braveness and intellect (Belas 457-460). however, Kant’s definition of enlightenment expels an open struggle, because it is able to return people to tutelage, depriving them of the possibility to obtain enlightenment. presenting to dispose of certain church and nation restrictions, Kant applies to two distinct usages of cause that constitute genuine enlightenment – ‘non-public’ usage and ‘public’ usage. As Kant points out, “by the general public use of one’s purpose I recognize the use of which someone makes of it as a student earlier than the reading public. personal use I call that which may make of it in a specific civil publish of office which entrusted to him” (89). even though the truth seeker draws a parallel between those concepts, he points on the reality that the personal utilization of cause must be subjected to sure obstacles, while the public utilization of reason ought to be kept unfastened, because “it alone can bring about enlightenment among guys” (Kant 89). on this regard, Moses Mendelssohn’s definition of the Enlightenment is just like Kant’s definition, but Mendelssohn is predicated on distinct concepts in his analysis. Mendelssohn regards enlightenment as the acquisition of specific know-how that creates the vital balance among someone as a citizen and a person as a individual. In view of this definition, Mendelssohn differentiates between ‘civil enlightenment’, which corresponds with sure social hobbies, and ‘human enlightenment’, which offers with i>GET ANSWER