For White Folks Who Teach in the Hood
Below is questions. Watch video
The Talk
What is the power of using this rap at the beginning of an academic talk?
How have terms, like, ‘multicultural’, lost their meaning? What Is an example of how these terms can be warped?
Losing the Meaning of Peace, Justice and Equity
How does warping these terms take away from the goals of peace, justice and equity?
The Role of Guilt in Teaching and Learning
What is the ‘dangerous minds’ model of recruiting privileged teachers Into low-Income schools overwhelmingly populated with students of color?
What are the ‘boulders’ that these teachers carry with them into the classroom, and how does that affect their work’?
What might ‘dumping White guilt off’ onto students look like in practice? What does crushing them look like?
Equity
How does Chris Emdin define equity? What critiques of ‘equity initiatives’ does Emdin deploy? What is the role of student voice in equity?
Reality Pedagogy
What Is reality pedagogy?
What does Emdin say the flaws are In how culturally relevant pedagogy is deployed?
Now does our guilt play into mistakes in deploying culturally relevant pedagogy?
5 C’s of Reality Pedagogy
What are COGENERATIVE DIALOGUES?
What Is CO-TEACHING?
What Is COSMOPOLITANISM?
What is CONTEXT?
What Is CONTENT?
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
The Power of Using Rap at the Beginning of an Academic Talk
Using rap at the beginning of an academic talk has the power to captivate the audience and grab their attention. It breaks away from traditional norms and expectations of academic settings, which tend to be formal and rigid. By incorporating rap, the speaker can create a sense of excitement, engagement, and cultural relevance, setting a tone that encourages openness and connection with the audience.
The Loss of Meaning of Terms Like ‘Multicultural’
Terms like ‘multicultural’ have lost their meaning due to their overuse and misinterpretation. Often, these terms are used superficially without a genuine understanding or appreciation of what they truly imply. For example, some institutions may claim to be multicultural by simply having diverse student bodies without actively addressing issues of power, privilege, or inclusivity. This warping of the term fails to acknowledge the systemic inequities that exist and undermines the true essence of multiculturalism.
The Impact of Warping Terms on Peace, Justice, and Equity
When terms such as peace, justice, and equity are warped or misused, it diminishes their importance and hinders progress towards achieving these goals. By distorting their meanings or using them superficially, the true essence of peace, justice, and equity is diluted. This can lead to complacency, perpetuation of inequalities, and a failure to address systemic issues that hinder social change.
The ‘Dangerous Minds’ Model of Recruiting Privileged Teachers
The ‘Dangerous Minds’ model refers to the practice of recruiting privileged teachers from outside low-income schools predominantly populated by students of color. This approach assumes that these teachers can bring change and save students from their circumstances. However, it fails to address the structural barriers faced by these students and creates a power dynamic where the teachers are seen as saviors rather than partners in education.
The Impact of Guilt on Teaching and Learning
Teachers who carry feelings of guilt when working in low-income schools may approach their work with a sense of inadequacy or a need to prove themselves. This can lead to either ‘dumping White guilt off’ onto students, which places an unfair burden on them, or ‘crushing’ students by having low expectations or perpetuating stereotypes. Both approaches hinder the development of a positive learning environment where students can thrive.
Chris Emdin’s Definition of Equity and Critiques of Equity Initiatives
Chris Emdin defines equity as actively working to ensure that all students have access to the resources, opportunities, and support they need to succeed academically and personally. He critiques equity initiatives that focus solely on equal distribution without considering the unique needs and experiences of students. Emdin argues that true equity requires recognizing and valuing student voice, allowing them to play an active role in shaping their educational experiences.
Reality Pedagogy and Its Flaws
Reality pedagogy is an approach that acknowledges and incorporates students’ cultural backgrounds, experiences, and interests into the learning process. However, Emdin highlights flaws in how culturally relevant pedagogy is often deployed. It can sometimes become performative or tokenistic, reducing cultures to stereotypes rather than genuinely engaging with diverse perspectives. This approach fails to address power dynamics or challenge existing systems of oppression.
The Role of Guilt in Mistakes with Culturally Relevant Pedagogy
Guilt can play a role in mistakes made when deploying culturally relevant pedagogy. Teachers may feel guilty about their lack of understanding or familiarity with different cultures, leading them to make assumptions or rely on stereotypes. This guilt can hinder their ability to genuinely connect with students or create inclusive learning environments. It is crucial for teachers to address their guilt by actively seeking knowledge, engaging in self-reflection, and building authentic relationships with their students.
The 5 C’s of Reality Pedagogy
COGENERATIVE DIALOGUES: These are dialogues that promote a collaborative learning environment where both teachers and students engage in critical discussions, share ideas, and co-construct knowledge.
CO-TEACHING: Co-teaching involves teachers working together as equals to plan, deliver instruction, and support student learning. This approach encourages collaboration and shared responsibility.
COSMOPOLITANISM: Cosmopolitanism refers to creating a classroom environment that embraces and values diverse cultures, perspectives, and experiences. It promotes global citizenship and fosters respect for all individuals.
CONTEXT: Context refers to understanding and incorporating students’ personal experiences, cultural backgrounds, and community dynamics into the learning process. It recognizes that learning is not isolated but connected to the broader social context.
CONTENT: Content refers to the academic material being taught. In reality pedagogy, content should be culturally relevant, meaningful, and connected to students’ lives and interests. It should reflect diverse perspectives and experiences.
In conclusion, using rap at the beginning of an academic talk can be powerful in capturing the audience’s attention. The loss of meaning in terms like ‘multicultural’ shows how they can be warped when not genuinely understood or implemented. Warping terms like peace, justice, and equity detracts from their goals by diluting their essence. The ‘Dangerous Minds’ model of recruiting privileged teachers into low-income schools brings its own set of challenges. Guilt can negatively impact teaching and learning by either dumping it off onto students or crushing them with low expectations. Chris Emdin’s reality pedagogy provides insights into flaws in culturally relevant pedagogy deployment. The 5 C’s of reality pedagogy – cogenenerative dialogues, co-teaching, cosmopolitanism, context, and content – offer a framework for effective teaching practices.