Ethics paper on The privatization of public services, particularly in the scope of scientific research funding, has raised significant ethical concerns regarding biases, transparency, accountability, and access.
A research problem is the main organizing principle guiding the analysis you write in your paper. The Final Paper should be original and should represent more than simply reviews or summaries of selected sources. The paper should represent some creativity of ideas on your part. This may consist of an approach to the topic of ethics research.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Solution
Sample Solution
The privatization of public services has been a growing trend in recent years, and scientific research funding is no exception. This has raised a number of ethical concerns, including biases, transparency, accountability, and access.
Biases
One of the main concerns with the privatization of scientific research funding is that it can lead to biases in the research that is conducted. This is because private funders may have their own interests in mind, and they may be more likely to fund research that supports those interests. For example, a pharmaceutical company may be more likely to fund research that supports the use of their drugs, even if there is evidence that other drugs are more effective.
Transparency
Another concern with the privatization of scientific research funding is that it can lead to a lack of transparency. This is because private funders are not required to disclose the same information about their funding decisions as public funders. This can make it difficult to track where the money is going and to ensure that it is being used in a responsible way.
Accountability
The privatization of scientific research funding can also lead to a lack of accountability. This is because private funders are not subject to the same oversight as public funders. This means that they can make funding decisions without having to answer to the public. This can be a problem, as it can lead to decisions being made that are not in the best interests of the public.
Access
Finally, the privatization of scientific research funding can lead to a lack of access to research. This is because private funders may not make their research findings available to the public. This can make it difficult for scientists to build on the work of others, and it can also make it difficult for the public to understand the latest scientific findings.
These are just some of the ethical concerns that have been raised about the privatization of scientific research funding. It is important to consider these concerns carefully before making decisions about how to fund scientific research.
Research Problem
The research problem that I will be addressing in this paper is the following:
How has the privatization of scientific research funding raised ethical concerns regarding biases, transparency, accountability, and access?
I will address this research problem by reviewing the relevant literature and by discussing the ethical implications of the privatization of scientific research funding. I will also propose some recommendations for how to address these ethical concerns.
Creativity of Ideas
I believe that my paper will represent some creativity of ideas on my part. This is because I will be taking a new approach to the topic of ethics research. I will be focusing on the ethical concerns that have been raised about the privatization of scientific research funding, and I will be proposing some recommendations for how to address these concerns.
I believe that this new approach is important because it will help to raise awareness of the ethical issues involved in the privatization of scientific research funding. It will also help to inform the debate about how to fund scientific research in a way that is ethical and responsible.
