Your text presents a conceptual outline of the return to sport process and discusses readiness to return to sport including psychological readiness.
Please discuss the following:
1) Who is included or on your “team” regarding the return to play decision making process (or who ideally would you like to see included) in your professional setting?
2) Gledhill and Forsdyke posit that athletes should only return to sport when they are physically AND psychologically ready. Do you have experience with the return to play decision making process? How have psychological factors been considered or measured? Has your thinking regarding return to sport changed during this module?
3) How might you convince a resistant coach or administrator to support psychological readiness when applied to return to sport?
This discussion is worth 20 points and will conclude Sunday night. You should be fully engaged within the discussion.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
The Return to Sport Process and Psychological Readiness
1) Team Members in the Return to Play Decision-Making Process
In my professional setting, the return to play decision-making process would ideally involve a multidisciplinary team. This team would consist of:
Sports Medicine Physician: The primary healthcare provider responsible for diagnosing and managing the athlete’s injury or condition.
Physical Therapist: Plays a crucial role in rehabilitating the athlete, focusing on restoring physical function and addressing any movement impairments.
Athletic Trainer: Provides ongoing care and support throughout the rehabilitation process, monitors progress, and helps implement injury prevention strategies.
Psychologist or Sports Psychologist: Assesses and addresses the psychological factors that may impact an athlete’s readiness to return to sport.
Coach: Provides insight into the athlete’s performance level, training progress, and game readiness.
Athlete: The athlete themselves should have an active role in the decision-making process, as they have personal insights into their physical and psychological well-being.
Collaboration among these professionals ensures a comprehensive approach to evaluating an athlete’s readiness to return to sport. Each team member brings a unique perspective and expertise, contributing to informed decision-making.
2) Consideration and Measurement of Psychological Factors
In my experience with the return to play decision-making process, psychological factors have been considered and measured through various methods. This includes:
Psychological Assessment: The use of standardized questionnaires, interviews, and psychological tests to evaluate an athlete’s mental well-being, coping skills, motivation, and confidence levels.
Clinical Interviews: Engaging in open and honest conversations with the athlete to understand their psychological state, fears, concerns, and expectations regarding returning to sport.
Observation: Observing an athlete’s behavior, body language, and emotional responses during rehabilitation sessions can provide insights into their psychological readiness.
Collaborative Approach: Involving a psychologist or sports psychologist in the team allows for ongoing evaluation and discussion of an athlete’s psychological readiness.
Throughout this module, my thinking regarding return to sport has evolved. I now recognize the critical role of psychological readiness in addition to physical readiness. Understanding that an athlete must be both physically and psychologically prepared before returning to sport is crucial for their long-term well-being and performance.
3) Convincing Resistant Coaches or Administrators to Support Psychological Readiness
When persuading a resistant coach or administrator to support psychological readiness in the return to sport process, it is essential to emphasize the following points:
Performance Enhancement: Highlight how considering psychological factors can positively impact an athlete’s performance. Psychological readiness can enhance focus, decision-making, confidence, and resilience, leading to improved on-field performance.
Injury Prevention: Emphasize that addressing psychological factors reduces the risk of reinjury. By ensuring athletes are mentally prepared and have a positive mindset, they are less likely to engage in risky behaviors or push themselves beyond their limits prematurely.
Long-Term Athlete Development: Explain that supporting psychological readiness aligns with a holistic approach to athlete development. Fostering mental well-being contributes to overall growth, resilience, and success both on and off the field.
Evidence-Based Approach: Provide research evidence supporting the influence of psychological factors on an athlete’s readiness to return to sport. Share studies that demonstrate the positive impact of psychological interventions on performance outcomes.
Additionally, offering educational workshops or seminars for coaches and administrators can help increase their understanding of the importance of psychological readiness. Inviting external experts, such as sports psychologists, to speak about the topic can provide valuable insights and address any concerns or misconceptions they may have.
