Consider the case of Tony Nicklinson (Topping, “Locked-in syndrome victims lose right to die’ case”). Should Nicklinson be able to have a doctor’s assistance in ending his life? Why or why not? Defend your answer carefully and in detail. (I have attached a pdf of the case called the case)
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
The Right to Die with Dignity: A Case for Tony Nicklinson’s Autonomy
Introduction
The case of Tony Nicklinson, a victim of locked-in syndrome, has sparked a contentious debate regarding an individual’s right to die with the assistance of a doctor. Locked-in syndrome is a devastating condition that leaves individuals completely paralyzed, unable to communicate or engage in any meaningful way with the world around them. In this essay, we will argue that Tony Nicklinson should have the right to have a doctor’s assistance in ending his life. By examining the ethical considerations, the principles of autonomy and dignity, and the potential safeguards that can be put in place, we will demonstrate that allowing assisted dying in such cases is a compassionate and humane approach.
Ethical Considerations
Respecting Autonomy: Autonomy, the right for individuals to make decisions about their own lives, is a fundamental ethical principle. By denying Tony Nicklinson the right to end his own life, we infringe upon his autonomy and subject him to prolonged suffering against his will.
Minimizing Harm: The principle of minimizing harm dictates that we should act in ways that reduce suffering. Tony Nicklinson’s locked-in syndrome has left him in a state of immense physical and emotional pain. Allowing him the choice to end his life through medical assistance would alleviate his suffering and minimize harm.
Balancing Beneficence and Non-maleficence: The principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) are essential to medical ethics. In Tony Nicklinson’s case, assisting him in dying would be an act of beneficence, as it would relieve him from an unbearable existence while avoiding further harm caused by his continued suffering.
Principles of Autonomy and Dignity
Preserving Personal Autonomy: Personal autonomy encompasses an individual’s right to make decisions about their own body and life. Tony Nicklinson, being mentally competent, has expressed a clear desire to end his life. Denying him this choice violates his autonomy and denies him control over his own destiny.
Dignity in Life and Death: Dignity is a fundamental human right that should be upheld throughout one’s life journey. For Tony Nicklinson, a life confined to a paralyzed body without any quality of life strips away his dignity. By allowing him the option of medical assistance in dying, we acknowledge his right to die with dignity, preserving his worth as a human being.
Safeguards and Regulation
Stringent Criteria: To ensure that assisted dying is not abused, strict criteria can be established. These criteria may include having multiple medical professionals agree on the patient’s diagnosis, prognosis, and mental competence. Additionally, a waiting period can be implemented to ensure that the decision is not impulsive.
Informed Consent: It is crucial that the patient provides informed consent, fully understanding the consequences of their decision. This would involve thorough discussions with medical professionals regarding alternative options, potential risks, and palliative care possibilities.
Independent Review Board: An independent review board can be established to assess each case individually and ensure that all legal and ethical requirements are met. This board would provide an extra layer of oversight and accountability.
Conclusion
In light of the ethical considerations surrounding autonomy, dignity, and minimizing harm, it is evident that Tony Nicklinson should have the right to choose medical assistance in ending his life. By recognizing his autonomy and preserving his dignity, society can provide a compassionate response to his unbearable suffering. Implementing stringent safeguards would ensure that this right is not abused and would provide a framework for this delicate matter. It is time to acknowledge the importance of individual autonomy and allow individuals like Tony Nicklinson to make choices about their own lives with compassion and respect.
