The role of criminal justice practitioners in the development and implementation of technology

by | Feb 28, 2023 | criminal justice

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is the role of criminal justice practitioners in the development and implementation of technology in the criminal justice system? Describe some of the controversial issues criminal justice policymakers face when considering an expansion in the use of DNA in criminal justice.

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Solution

The role of criminal justice practitioners in the development and implementation of technology in the criminal justice system is to ensure that new technologies are used ethically, safely, and effectively. Technological advances can offer advantages such as improved efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of information within crime-fighting efforts. Furthermore, they can also provide greater protection for victims of crimes by providing better evidence collection methods and more comprehensive record-keeping procedures. As such, content experts must be consulted to ensure the quality and accuracy of these systems.

Although technology has been hailed as a tool that provides both investigative capability and evidence preservation capabilities within the criminal justice system, it also presents its own set of ethical issues. These include questions about privacy rights as well as potential biases that may be built into algorithms or data evaluations tools related to decision making practices within criminal justice policies. Criminal justice policymakers must consider these important elements when deciding whether or not to expand their use of technology in order to protect citizens’ rights while still maintaining public safety objectives at all times.

Sample Solution

The role of criminal justice practitioners in the development and implementation of technology in the criminal justice system is to ensure that new technologies are used ethically, safely, and effectively. Technological advances can offer advantages such as improved efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of information within crime-fighting efforts. Furthermore, they can also provide greater protection for victims of crimes by providing better evidence collection methods and more comprehensive record-keeping procedures. As such, content experts must be consulted to ensure the quality and accuracy of these systems.

Although technology has been hailed as a tool that provides both investigative capability and evidence preservation capabilities within the criminal justice system, it also presents its own set of ethical issues. These include questions about privacy rights as well as potential biases that may be built into algorithms or data evaluations tools related to decision making practices within criminal justice policies. Criminal justice policymakers must consider these important elements when deciding whether or not to expand their use of technology in order to protect citizens’ rights while still maintaining public safety objectives at all times.

One controversial issue facing criminal justice policymakers when considering an expansion in DNA use is the question regarding how much autonomy should police agencies have with regards to using this type of evidence? Questions around this concern stem from possible misinterpretation or misuse due to lack of training or technical knowledge needed for proper use; furthermore issues relating to bias which may arise if certain demographics are overrepresented in databases used for forensic analysis could potentially lead to unlawful outcomes if left unchecked. Additionally there is debate over when collecting a person’s DNA should be considered appropriate; some argue it should only happen after conviction while others insist on collecting DNA upon arrest regardless if charges are filed or not due its effectiveness at solving cold cases quickly – raising further concerns around civil liberties (including Fourth Amendment Rights) being violated through overly aggressive policing tactics which target certain populations deemed unfavorable by law enforcement officials leading towards unfair profiling practices which could potentially go unnoticed until they cause irreparable harm against individuals/communities who were unjustly targeted because their profile matched criminals’ characteristics . Finally there remains controversy over who owns DNA samples collected from individuals: do private companies have ownership rights since they provided product/technology used for sample gathering? Do law enforcement agencies have control even though samples were taken without express permission from subject?? Ultimately this type legal gray area needs clear direction before expansion on DNAs usage becomes widespread otherwise abuses will occur creating dangerous situations where innocent people get wrongfully convicted due faulty interpretation arising from poorly configured software programs utilized by police departments – thus putting victims at risk .

This question has been answered.

Get Answer