One controversial issue facing criminal justice policymakers when considering an expansion in DNA use is the question regarding how much autonomy should police agencies have with regards to using this type of evidence? Questions around this concern stem from possible misinterpretation or misuse due to lack of training or technical knowledge needed for proper use; furthermore issues relating to bias which may arise if certain demographics are overrepresented in databases used for forensic analysis could potentially lead to unlawful outcomes if left unchecked. Additionally there is debate over when collecting a person’s DNA should be considered appropriate; some argue it should only happen after conviction while others insist on collecting DNA upon arrest regardless if charges are filed or not due its effectiveness at solving cold cases quickly - raising further concerns around civil liberties (including Fourth Amendment Rights) being violated through overly aggressive policing tactics which target certain populations deemed unfavorable by law enforcement officials leading towards unfair profiling practices which could potentially go unnoticed until they cause irreparable harm against individuals/communities who were unjustly targeted because their profile matched criminals' characteristics . Finally there remains controversy over who owns DNA samples collected from individuals: do private companies have ownership rights since they provided product/technology used for sample gathering? Do law enforcement agencies have control even though samples were taken without express permission from subject?? Ultimately this type legal gray area needs clear direction before expansion on DNAs usage becomes widespread otherwise abuses will occur creating dangerous situations where innocent people get wrongfully convicted due faulty interpretation arising from poorly configured software programs utilized by police departments – thus putting victims at risk .

Sample Solution

The role of criminal justice practitioners in the development and implementation of technology in the criminal justice system is to ensure that new technologies are used ethically, safely, and effectively. Technological advances can offer advantages such as improved efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of information within crime-fighting efforts. Furthermore, they can also provide greater protection for victims of crimes by providing better evidence collection methods and more comprehensive record-keeping procedures. As such, content experts must be consulted to ensure the quality and accuracy of these systems. Although technology has been hailed as a tool that provides both investigative capability and evidence preservation capabilities within the criminal justice system, it also presents its own set of ethical issues. These include questions about privacy rights as well as potential biases that may be built into algorithms or data evaluations tools related to decision making practices within criminal justice policies. Criminal justice policymakers must consider these important elements when deciding whether or not to expand their use of technology in order to protect citizens’ rights while still maintaining public safety objectives at all times.