Write a six to nine-page (1500-2250 words) essay that relates and applies the course material found in Module Six to two of the online videos.
Videos:
● Behind the Wall; 2010 (video; 49:00 CC) https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2675576109
● Life Inside Out; 2005 (video, 1:13:29 CC) https://www.nfb.ca/film/life_inside_out/

Module 6, Section 6.2:
The vast majority of inmates are considered non-violent by police and correctional authorities because only 1 in 3 Canadian adults in correctional institutions are there for violent crimes (CCJC Admin, 2011; Calverley, 2015). Since violence offenders are only imprisoned after a victimization and often re-commit more violent offences on release, imprisonment gives an “amount of protection to vulnerable populations so small as to be much beneath what could be considered minimal” (Brodeur, 1996). Too often, prison environments actually reinforce criminal behaviour and can even harden non-violent low-risk individuals into committing worse crimes. Rather than keep people safe, the correction system “risks creating a criminal underclass that moves endlessly in and out of prison, committing more and more serious offences at each turn” (Clarke, 2011). For example, North America was ‘protected’ from marijuana-users at the cost of turning some of them into lives of crime through prison sentences that increased their exposure to violence and criminal networks. (Module 6, Section 6.2, Carceral States and Capitalism)
The role of criminal law and corrections is to show that there is no alternative to the capitalist market except incarceration. (Module 6, Section 6.2, Carceral States and Capitalism) Once a population willingly accepts the sacrifice of its poorest members, they shatter the unity – and thus political power – of their democracy, allowing elite power to once again dominate. (Module 6, Section 6.2, The Age of Retribution)
By embracing retribution, ‘get tough’ attitudes, and the vocabulary of punitiveness, politicians seemed to discover a magical political formula: “never be for (or capable of being portrayed as being for) criminals or prisoners as individuals or as a class.” (Module 6, Section 6.2, Governing through Crime)
“[c]arceral ideology, by definition, can never be discredited. If crime and murders increase under reformers, the reform is to blame. If crime and murders increase under the most well-funded police departments and harshest prosecutors on Earth, they simply need more funding and to be even harsher. It’s a rigged game—social science and data are irrelevant. What matters is The Narrative, and no amount of counter-narrative, counter facts, or glaring media double standards will stand in The Narrative’s way.” (Johnson, n.d.) (Module 6, Section 6.2, Governing through Crime)
“If we blame […] crack, our politicians are off the hook. Forgotten are the failed schools, the malign welfare programs, the desolate neighborhoods, the wasted years. Only crack is to blame. One is tempted to think that if crack did not exist, someone, somewhere would have received a federal grant to develop it.” (Walinsky, 1986) (Module 6, Section 6.2, Governing through Crime)
“refuse to lead citizens to higher ground, to challenge us, to inspire us to find our better selves. Instead they panders to our worst sentiments, personalise everything, deride experts and evidence, tells us that we are great as we are, that we have every right to feel morally superior. It divides the world up into good and bad, black and white. This world, to paraphrase sociologist Orrin Klapp, is destructively divided up into heroes (“hard-working, law-abiding tax payers”) and villains (criminals, terrorists and fools – all the elites and so-called experts who are ‘soft’ on crime and ‘soft’ on terror). This view gives no space to the idea of redemption or, for that matter, to compassion, and brooks no debate on what the evidence might tell us or about the costs of punishment.
And in the end, in the name of safety, we are less safe. In the name of democracy, we are less free. And in our refusal to have the debate, to move beyond our prejudices, our fears, our anger, we make Canada a meaner and smaller place.” (Himelfarb, 2011) (Module 6, Section 6.2, Governing through Crime)

 

 

Sample Solution

The videos “Behind the Wall” and “Life Inside Out” provide a glimpse into the lives of prisoners at Kingston Penitentiary, one of Canada’s oldest and most infamous prisons.

Sample Solution

The videos “Behind the Wall” and “Life Inside Out” provide a glimpse into the lives of prisoners at Kingston Penitentiary, one of Canada’s oldest and most infamous prisons.

The videos “Behind the Wall” and “Life Inside Out” provide a glimpse into the lives of prisoners at Kingston Penitentiary, one of Canada’s oldest and most infamous prisons. The videos document the challenges and struggles that prisoners face, as well as the hope and resilience that they often find within the prison walls.

The videos also raise important questions about the role of prisons in society and the debate over the purpose of punishment. The course material in Module Six provides a theoretical framework for understanding the videos and for discussing these questions.

The Role of Prisons in Society

The videos “Behind the Wall” and “Life Inside Out” show how prisons can be a place of both punishment and rehabilitation. On the one hand, prisoners are often subjected to harsh conditions, such as solitary confinement and long hours of labor. On the other hand, some prisoners are able to find hope and resilience through education, religious faith, and the support of family and friends.

The course material in Module Six discusses the different purposes of punishment. The traditional view is that punishment is a way to deter crime and to protect society from dangerous individuals. However, the course material also discusses the rehabilitative purpose of punishment. Rehabilitation is the idea that punishment should be used to help offenders change their behavior and become productive members of society.

The Debate over the Purpose of Punishment

The debate over the purpose of punishment is a complex one. There are strong arguments to be made for both the deterrent and rehabilitative purposes of punishment. However, the course material in Module Six argues that the rehabilitative purpose of punishment is often overlooked. The course material also argues that prisons are often ineffective at achieving either the deterrent or rehabilitative purposes of punishment.

The Videos and the Course Material

The videos “Behind the Wall” and “Life Inside Out” provide a valuable opportunity to apply the course material in Module Six to real-world examples. The videos show how the challenges of prison life can lead to violence, drug use, and mental illness. The videos also show how some prisoners find hope and resilience through education, religious faith, and the support of family and friends.

The videos also raise important questions about the role of prisons in society and the debate over the purpose of punishment. The course material in Module Six provides a theoretical framework for understanding the videos and for discussing these questions.

Conclusion

The videos “Behind the Wall” and “Life Inside Out” are a valuable resource for understanding the experiences of prisoners and for raising awareness of the challenges of prison life. The videos also provide a platform for discussing the role of prisons in society and the debate over the purpose of punishment.

In addition to the points made above, the videos also highlight the following:

  • The disproportionate impact of the criminal justice system on marginalized communities.
  • The importance of education and rehabilitation in reducing recidivism.
  • The need for a more humane and compassionate approach to criminal justice.

The videos are a powerful reminder that the criminal justice system is not just about punishment. It is also about rehabilitation and redemption. We need to do more to ensure that our prisons are places where people can change their lives for the better.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer