What are the three levels of judiciary? What role does the Governor play in appointing members of the bench in Californian legal politics?
Sample Solution
Discuss two possible solutions to the issue of judicial diversity in California.
The three levels of judiciary are federal, state, and local. The federal judicial system is made up of U.S. district courts as well as appellate courts which hear cases that have been appealed from lower courts or tribunals; these decisions may eventually be heard by the Supreme Court if necessary. The state level consists of trial courts where cases are initially heard before potentially being sent up through various appellate court systems depending on what jurisdiction they fall under .
Sample Solution
Discuss two possible solutions to the issue of judicial diversity in California.
The three levels of judiciary are federal, state, and local. The federal judicial system is made up of U.S. district courts as well as appellate courts which hear cases that have been appealed from lower courts or tribunals; these decisions may eventually be heard by the Supreme Court if necessary. The state level consists of trial courts where cases are initially heard before potentially being sent up through various appellate court systems depending on what jurisdiction they fall under .
inally , there are local jurisdictions like municipal or county-level courthouses which focus more on resolving disputes within small geographic areas rather than dealing with large – scale issues (Findlaw) .< br > < br >In California , governor plays integral role appointing members bench serving both state federal judiciaries . This due fact Golden State follows modified version Missouri Plan which requires gubernatorial confirmation all nominees put forward for particular positions mentioned earlier (California Governor’s Office). Such selection process usually begins with nomination either Assembly Member Senate President Pro Tem who then must submit proposed individual their respective party’s central committee afterwards input sought out from standing commission Judicial Appointments created by Governor appointees chosen based off evaluations completed this body ultimately lead them being presented Chief Executive his/her eventual approval ratification.
One solution improving judicial diversity california could involve increasing overall representation among pool applicants appointed seats something could accomplished few ways such establishing scholarship programs students interested pursuing legal career promoting awareness available opportunities general public or even giving preference candidates come historically disadvantaged communities order better reflect population make fair decisions concerning matters affect everyone regardless background (Williams et al ). Another option might simply not allowing anyone serve four terms consecutively thus ensuring fresh perspectives introduced often instead having same people coming back time again . Doing so can aid ensuring judges remain impartial when settling disputes still continue provide unbiased judgements throughout course their tenure.< br > < br >In conclusion , governor holds great deal power regards selecting who serves bench Californian legal politics due current structure place it important for voters take into consideration whom elect office allowing them determine success failure when comes making sure diverse opinions represented courtrooms across state . Solutions discussed here hopefully help decision makers strive towards more equitable composition judiciary while also preserving integrity justice place at same time.
